ArticleKidney medicine2022
Efficacy and Safety of Immunosuppressive Therapy in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Article in Kidney medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of nine immunosuppressive agents for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in adults: a pairwise and network meta-analysis.Renal failure · 2024Pooled it
- Treatment of Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Emerging Extracorporeal Therapies.Blood purification · 2026Review
- Treatment Response Rates and Kidney Outcomes among Adults with Primary FSGS.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2026Article
- Editorial: Case reports in thrombosis: 2025.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Patterns of Glomerular Injury: Histopathological Classification and Clinical Correlation.Cureus · 2025Review
- Trehalose alleviates nephropathy in focal segmental glomerulosclerosis via the upregulation of the WT-1/EZH2 pathway.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Clinical profile, treatment response, and outcomes in adult primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis: A single-center experience.Clinical nephrology · 2025Article
- Management of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in resource-limited regions.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024Article
- Novel Pathogenic Mutation of P209L in TRPC6 Gene Causes Adult Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis.Biochemical genetics · 2024Article
- Renal Epithelial Complement C3 Expression Affects Kidney Fibrosis Progression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Precision medicine for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.Kidney research and clinical practice · 2024Article
- Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis With Superimposed Infection-Related Glomerulonephritis in a Diabetic Patient: A Case of Rapid Renal Decline.Clinical case reports · 2024Article
- Review
- Implications of Complete Proteinuria Remission at any Time in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Sparsentan DUET Trial.Kidney international reports · 2023Article
- Rituximab in the treatment of primary FSGS: time for its use in routine clinical practice?Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
- The role of HLA antigens in recurrent primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Lived Experiences of Patients and Care Providers in Focal Segmental Glomerular Sclerosis and IgA Nephropathy.Glomerular diseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rationale & Objective: Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare condition that can lead to kidney function decline and chronic kidney failure. Immunosuppressants are used to treat primary FSGS. However, their efficacy and safety in FSGS are not clearly established. We assessed current knowledge on clinical effectiveness and safety of immunosuppressants for primary FSGS. Study Design: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized controlled trials, observational studies, retrospective studies, and registries. Setting & Participants: Patients with primary and genetic FSGS. Selection Criteria for Studies: Medline, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for English-language, primary-FSGS studies from inception to 2019. Clinical outcomes were changes from baseline in proteinuria, kidney function, and kidney survival. Data Extraction: 2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Analytical Approach: Study results were summarized using random-effects models either as ratios of means between follow-up and baseline measurements or as HRs. Results: We included 98 articles. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient baseline characteristics and study designs. Most studies assessed treatment with corticosteroids alone or combined with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. Patients treated with immunosuppressants showed reduced proteinuria (14 studies; ratio of means, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.20-0.47), decreased creatinine clearance (mean difference, -25.03; 95% CI, -59.33 to -9.27) and (significantly) lower estimated glomerular filtration rates (mean difference, -7.61 mL/min/1.73 m Limitations: Heterogeneity in study designs, patient populations, and treatment regimens; no access to individual patient-level data. Conclusions: This systematic review supports proteinuria reduction with immunosuppressant therapy in primary FSGS over varying follow-up periods. The effects of immunosuppressants on kidney survival remain uncertain. This review underscores the need for better-designed and adequately controlled studies to assess immunosuppressant therapy in patients with primary FSGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.