ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Analysis of the Effect of Percutaneous Cone Shaping in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retracted: Analysis of the Effect of Percutaneous Cone Shaping in Patients with Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/966ACD3D229191AB19057A4DF70F0A
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To study and analyze the clinical effect of percutaneous cone shaping in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Methods: A total of 100 patients with vertebral osteoporotic fracture treated in our hospital from June 2019 to September 2020 were selected, and there were 50 patients with vertebral osteoporotic fracture in each group. Patients could be divided into two groups according to different treatment plans: one group was vertebroplasty patients for group A, and the other group was nonsurgical treatment patients for group B. The incidence of complications during treatment and follow-up was recorded in both groups. Results: According to a study, both groups of patients completed the treatment and follow-up, no patients lost to follow-up or death, the VAS scores and ADL scores of patients before treatment were higher, and there was no significant difference at baseline ( Conclusions: Percutaneous cone plasty can provide rapid relief of pain symptoms in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures and significantly improve their daily activities. However, there was no significant difference in long-term recovery from group B. In terms of the incidence of complications, the incidence of complications in group A was lower than that in group B after certain treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.