Evidence mapPaperPMID 36034458Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Comparative efficacy and safety of glucose-lowering drugs in children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Sijia Wu, Yina He, Yutong Wu, Yiman Ji, Lei Hou, Xinhui Liu, Yilei Ge, Yuanyuan Yu, Yifan Yu, Yun Wei and 9 more

Open access · goldFull text readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sijia WuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yina HeDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yutong WuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yiman JiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Lei HouDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xinhui LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yilei GeDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yuanyuan YuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yifan YuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yun WeiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Fengtong QianDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Qingxin LuoDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yue FengDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yiping FengDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Jiongjiong WangDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Meiling HuoQilu Children's Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Hongkai LiDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Fuzhong XueDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yunxia LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Shandong University · CNQilu Hospital of Shandong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Type 2 diabetes is more common in adults, but is becoming the major concern in children and adolescent recently. This study aimed to provide additional pharmaceutical management for children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes by assessing the efficacy and safety of several glucose-lowering drugs. Methods: Searches were performed in PubMed, Medline, Ovid, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov that reported the efficacy and safety of drugs for children and adolescents with type 2 diabetes. Pooled effects were calculated by frequentist fixed effects network meta-analyses and additive network meta-analyses. Results: A total of 12 trials assessing eight glucose-lowering drugs were included, which compose of seven trials with monotherapy and five trials with combination therapies. Network meta-analysis results showed compared to placebo, saxagliptin+metformin (mean difference (MD) -1.91% [-2.85%, -0.97%]), liraglutide+metformin (MD -1.45% [-1.65%, -1.26%]), and liraglutide (MD -0.90% [-1.35%, -0.45%]) were the top 3 drugs that significantly reduced hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Sitagliptin+metformin, dapagliflozin, exenatide-2mcg, linagliptin-5mg, metformin, exenatide-5/10mcg, glimepiride, and sitagliptin also showed significant reduction in HbA1c. There were no significant differences between treatments in the incidence of adverse events, except that liraglutide+metformin had significant adverse effect such as abdominal pain. In addition, dapagliflozin, sitagliptin+metformin, and saxagliptin+metformin showed better efficacy compared with FDA-approved drugs. Conclusions: The top 10 treatments of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents aged 10-17 years were saxagliptin+metformin, liraglutide+metformin, liraglutide, dapagliflozin, exenatide-2 mcg, sitagliptin+metformin, linagliptin-5 mg, linagliptin-1 mg, metformin, and exenatide-5/10 mcg. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=284897, identifier CRD42021284897.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2MetforminAdolescentAdultChildExenatideGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsLinagliptinLiraglutideSitagliptin PhosphateExenatideGlucoseGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsLinagliptinLiraglutideMetforminSitagliptin Phosphateadolescentsfrequentist network meta- analysisglucose-lowering drugsglycosylated hemoglobin A1csystematic review & meta-analysistype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID36034458
PMCPMC9402979
OpenAlexW4291003989

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.