Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36035672›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2022

Regulation of plant biotic interactions and abiotic stress responses by inositol polyphosphates.

Esther Riemer, Naga Jyothi Pullagurla, Ranjana Yadav, Priyanshi Rana, Henning J Jessen, Marília Kamleitner, Gabriel Schaaf, Debabrata Laha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Science advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. EstablishingAnalytical chemistry · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Opportunity for genome engineering to enhance phosphate homeostasis in crops.Physiology and molecular biology of plants : an international journal of functional plant biology · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Esther RiemerDepartmentof Plant Nutrition, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Naga Jyothi PullagurlaDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Ranjana YadavDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Priyanshi RanaDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.
Henning J JessenDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacy & CIBSS - The Center of Biological Signaling Studies, Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marília KamleitnerDepartmentof Plant Nutrition, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Gabriel SchaafDepartmentof Plant Nutrition, Institute of Crop Science and Resource Conservation, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Debabrata LahaDepartment of Biochemistry, Indian Institute of Science, Bengaluru, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inositol pyrophosphates (PP-InsPs), derivatives of inositol hexakisphosphate (phytic acid, InsP

Indexed as

auxin responseinositol pyrophosphatejasmonic acid signaling pathwayphosphate homeostasisplant biotic and abiotic stress responsessalicylic acid signaling pathway

Identifiers

PMID36035672
PMCPMC9403785

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.