Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036607›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2022

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling of Cell-Free DNA in Men With Advanced Prostate Cancer: Differences in Genomic Landscape Based on Race.

Raquel Zimmerman, Mehmet A Bilen, Elisabeth I Heath, Lakshminarayanan Nandagopal, Umang Swami, Adam Kessel, Ellen Jaeger, Sergiusz Wesolowski, Edgar J Hernanadez, Jonathan Chipman and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. NCI workshop on ctDNA in cancer treatment and clinical care.Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Raquel ZimmermanUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7589-1037
Mehmet A BilenDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Elisabeth I HeathDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lakshminarayanan NandagopalUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Umang SwamiHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Adam KesselHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Ellen JaegerDeming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Sergiusz WesolowskiDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Edgar J HernanadezDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Jonathan ChipmanUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Alleda MackKarmanos Cancer Institute, Department of Oncology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI, USA.
Deepak RavindranathanDepartment of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Benjamin L MaughanUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Roberto NussenzveigHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Mark YandellDepartment of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Manish KohliHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Michael B LillyMedical University of South Carolina Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, SC, USA.
A Oliver SartorDeming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Neeraj AgarwalHuntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Pedro C BarataDeming Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, Tulane University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8890-2951
University of Utah · USEmory University · USTulane University · USMedical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USWayne State University · US

Funding

Utah Center for Clinical and Translational ScienceUL1TR002538 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI HESS, RACHEL, MAJERSIK, JENNIFER JUHL · 2018 to 2022
$26.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002538
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced prostate cancer (aPC) in Black men was reported to present with aggressive features and to be associated with poor prognosis. Herein, we compared the cell-free DNA (cfDNA) genomic landscape of aPC in Black vs White men. Patients (pts) with aPC from 6 academic institutions and available cfDNA comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) were included. Association between mutated genes and race was evaluated using Barnard's test and a Probabilistic Graphical Model (PGM) machine learning approach. Analysis included 743 aPC pts (217 Black, 526 White) with available cfDNA CGP. The frequency of alterations in the androgen receptor gene was significantly higher in Black vs White men (55.3% vs 35% respectively, P < .001). Additionally, alterations in EGFR, MYC, FGFR1, and CTNNB1 were present at higher frequencies in Black men. PGM analysis and Barnard's test were concordant. Findings from the largest cohort of Black men with aPC undergoing cfDNA CGP may guide further drug development in these men.

Indexed as

Cell-Free Nucleic AcidsProstatic NeoplasmsErbB ReceptorsGenomicsHumansMaleReceptors, AndrogenCell-Free Nucleic AcidsErbB ReceptorsReceptors, AndrogenBlackcell-free DNAcomprehensive genomic profilingprostate cancerWhite

Identifiers

PMID36036607
PMCPMC9526493
OpenAlexW4293452653

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.