Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36036741›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of cell biology2022

Quality control mechanisms that protect nuclear envelope identity and function.

Philip J Mannino, C Patrick Lusk

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of cell biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A multiomics atlas of theScience advances · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

The mechanism of ESCRT-mediated surveillance of the nuclear envelope barrierR01GM105672 · NIGMS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI LUSK, CHARLES PATRICK · 2013 to 2025
$4.6M
Nuclear pore complex quality control in ALS/FTDR01NS122236 · NINDS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI LUSK, CHARLES PATRICK, ROTHSTEIN, JEFFREY D · 2021 to 2025
$4.0M
Establishing a Mechanism for the Autophagic Degradation of Nuclear Components and its Relationship to AgingF31AG069490 · NIA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MANNINO, PHILIP · 2021 to 2023
$139k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG069490NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM105672NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS122236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nuclear envelope (NE) is a specialization of the endoplasmic reticulum with distinct biochemistry that defines inner and outer membranes connected at a pore membrane that houses nuclear pore complexes (NPCs). Quality control mechanisms that maintain the physical integrity and biochemical identity of these membranes are critical to ensure that the NE acts as a selective barrier that also contributes to genome stability and metabolism. As the proteome of the NE is highly integrated, it is challenging to turn over by conventional ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagy mechanisms. Further, removal of entire sections of the NE requires elaborate membrane remodeling that is poorly understood. Nonetheless, recent work has made inroads into discovering specializations of cellular degradative machineries tailored to meeting the unique challenges imposed by the NE. In addition, cells have evolved mechanisms to surveil and repair the NE barrier to protect against the deleterious effects of a breach in NE integrity, in the form of either a ruptured NE or a dysfunctional NPC. Here, we synthesize the most recent work exploring NE quality control mechanisms across eukaryotes.

Indexed as

Nuclear EnvelopeNuclear PoreEndoplasmic ReticulumNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsUbiquitinNuclear Pore Complex ProteinsUbiquitin

Identifiers

PMID36036741
PMCPMC9442147
OpenAlexW4293453127

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.