Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36038888›Full record

ArticleChinese medicine2022

Quantification of prevalence, clinical characteristics, co-existence, and geographic variations of traditional Chinese medicine diagnostic patterns via latent tree analysis-based differentiation rules among functional dyspepsia patients.

Leonard Ho, Yulong Xu, Nevin L Zhang, Fai Fai Ho, Irene X Y Wu, Shuijiao Chen, Xiaowei Liu, Charlene H L Wong, Jessica Y L Ching, Pui Kuan Cheong and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chinese medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonard HoSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Yulong XuSchool of Information Technology, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Nevin L ZhangDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, School of Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Fai Fai HoSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Irene X Y WuXiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, 5/F, 238 Shang-Ma-Yuan-Ling Alley, Kai-Fu District, Changsha, Hunan, China. irenexywu@csu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3772-2376
Shuijiao ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Xiaowei LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xiangya Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Charlene H L WongThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Jessica Y L ChingInstitute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Pui Kuan CheongInstitute of Digestive Diseases, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Wing Fai YeungSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Justin C Y WuDepartment of Medicine and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Vincent C H ChungSchool of Chinese Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Chinese University of Hong Kong · HKHunan International Economics University · CNCentral South University · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Henan University · CNHong Kong Polytechnic University · HKHong Kong University of Science and Technology · HK

Funding

Health and Medical Research Fund 03170027National Natural Science Foundation of China 81973709Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province 2019JJ40348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) treatment strategies are guided by pattern differentiation, as documented in the eleventh edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD). However, no standards for pattern differentiation are proposed to ensure inter-rater agreement. Without standardisation, research on associations between TCM diagnostic patterns, clinical features, and geographical characteristics is also not feasible. This diagnostic cross-sectional study aimed to (i) establish the pattern differentiation rules of functional dyspepsia (FD) using latent tree analysis (LTA); (ii) compare the prevalence of diagnostic patterns in Hong Kong and Hunan; (iii) discover the co-existence of diagnostic patterns; and (iv) reveal the associations between diagnostic patterns and FD common comorbidities.

methodsA total of 250 and 150 participants with FD consecutively sampled in Hong Kong and Hunan, respectively, completed a questionnaire on TCM clinical features. LTA was performed to reveal TCM diagnostic patterns of FD and derive relevant pattern differentiation rules. Multivariate regression analyses were performed to quantify correlations between different diagnostic patterns and between diagnostic patterns and clinical and geographical variables.

resultsAt least one TCM diagnostic pattern was differentiated in 70.7%, 73.6%, and 64.0% of the participants in the overall (n = 400), Hong Kong (n = 250), and Hunan (n = 150) samples, respectively, using the eight pattern differentiation rules derived. 52.7% to 59.6% of the participants were diagnosed with two or more diagnostic patterns. Cold-heat complex (59.8%) and spleen-stomach dampness-heat (77.1%) were the most prevalent diagnostic patterns in Hong Kong and Hunan, respectively. Spleen-stomach deficiency cold was highly likely to co-exist with spleen-stomach qi deficiency (adjusted odds ratio (AOR): 53.23; 95% confidence interval (CI): 21.77 to 130.16). Participants with severe anxiety tended to have liver qi invading the stomach (AOR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08 to 1.33).

conclusionsFuture updates of the ICD, textbooks, and guidelines should emphasise the importance of clinical and geographical variations in TCM diagnosis. Location-specific pattern differentiation rules should be derived from local data using LTA. In future, patients' pattern differentiation results, local prevalence of TCM diagnostic patterns, and corresponding TCM treatment choices should be accessible to practitioners on online clinical decision support systems to streamline service delivery.

Indexed as

Chinese traditionalCluster analysisDiagnosisDyspepsiaMachine learningMedicine

Identifiers

PMID36038888
PMCPMC9425972
OpenAlexW4293734304

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.