Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36039293›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Transposons and non-coding regions drive the intrafamily differences of genome size in insects.

Yuyang Cong, Xinhai Ye, Yang Mei, Kang He, Fei Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Transposable Element-Driven PIEZO Mutation Enhances Locust Flight in Plateau Hypoxia.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome size estimation and evolution trends in Acari.Experimental & applied acarology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Telomeric assemblies ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A genome survey ofZooKeys · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yuyang CongState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology & Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Xinhai YeState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology & Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Yang MeiState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology & Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Kang HeState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology & Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Fei LiState Key Laboratory of Rice Biology & Ministry of Agricultural and Rural Affairs Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology of Crop Pathogens and Insects, Institute of Insect Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome size (GS) can vary considerably between phylogenetically close species, but the landscape of GS changes in insects remain largely unclear. To better understand the specific evolutionary factors that determine GS in insects, we examined flow cytometry-based published GS data from 1,326 insect species, spanning 700 genera, 155 families, and 21 orders. Model fitting showed that GS generally followed an Ornstein-Uhlenbeck adaptive evolutionary model in Insecta overall. Ancestral reconstruction indicated a likely GS of 1,069 Mb, suggesting that most insect clades appeared to undergo massive genome expansions or contractions. Quantification of genomic components in 56 species from nine families in four insect orders revealed that the proliferation of transposable elements contributed to high variation in GS between close species, such as within Coleoptera. This study sheds lights on the pattern of GS variation in insects and provides a better understanding of insect GS evolution.

Indexed as

Evolutionary biologyGenomicsPhylogenetics

Identifiers

PMID36039293
PMCPMC9418806

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.