Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36045392›Full record

Trial reportSubstance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy2022

Effectiveness of a practice change intervention in reducing alcohol consumption in pregnant women attending public maternity services.

Tracey W Tsang, Melanie Kingsland, Emma Doherty, John Wiggers, John Attia, Luke Wolfenden, Adrian Dunlop, Belinda Tully, Ian Symonds, Chris Rissel and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Tracey W TsangDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Melanie KingslandHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Longworth Ave, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia. melanie.kingsland@health.nsw.gov.au.
Emma DohertyHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Longworth Ave, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
John WiggersHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Longworth Ave, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
John AttiaHunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW, 2305, Australia.
Luke WolfendenHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Longworth Ave, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Adrian DunlopDrug and Alcohol Clinical Services, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
Belinda TullyHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Longworth Ave, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Ian SymondsThe International Medical University, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Chris RisselCollege of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Casuarina, NT, 0909, Australia.
Christophe LecathelinaisHunter New England Population Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Longworth Ave, Locked Bag 10, Wallsend, NSW, 2287, Australia.
Elizabeth J ElliottDiscipline of Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney Children's Hospital at Westmead Clinical School, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Hunter New England Local Health District · AUHunter Medical Research Institute · AUUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AUChildren's Hospital at Westmead · AUFlinders University · AUInternational Medical University · MYSydney Children’s Hospitals Network · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of this study was to examine the effect of a practice change intervention to support the implementation of guideline-recommended care for addressing alcohol use in pregnancy on self-reported alcohol use during pregnancy.

methodsA randomized, stepped-wedge controlled trial in three clusters (sectors) within the Hunter New England Local Health District (NSW, Australia). We evaluated a practice change intervention that supported the introduction of a new model of care for reducing alcohol use in pregnancy, consistent with local and international guidelines, and implemented in random order across the sectors. Each week throughout the study period, pregnant women who attended any public antenatal services within the previous week, for a 27-28 or 35-36 week gestation visit, were randomly sampled and invited to participate in the survey. The intended intervention for all women was Brief advice (to abstain from alcohol and information about potential risks). Women identified as medium-risk alcohol consumers using the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test-Consumption (AUDIT-C) were to be offered referral to a phone coaching service, and women identified as high-risk were to be offered referral to a Drug and Alcohol Service. Rates of self-reported alcohol use (AUDIT-C risk level and special occasion drinking) were summarized and compared in groups of women pre-intervention and post-intervention using multivariable logistic regression.

resultsSurveys were completed by 1309 women at pre-intervention and 2540 at post-intervention. The majority of women did not drink during pregnancy (pre-intervention: 89.68%; post-intervention: 90.74%). There was no change in the proportion of women classified as No risk from drinking (AUDIT-C score = 0) or Some risk from drinking (AUDIT-C score ≥ 1) pre- or post-intervention (p = 0.08). However, a significant reduction in special occasion drinking was observed (pre-intervention: 11.59%; post-intervention: 8.43%; p < 0.001).

conclusionsSpecial occasion drinking was reduced following implementation of guideline-recommended care. Failure to change other patterns of alcohol use in pregnancy may reflect barriers to implementing the model of care in antenatal care settings and the need to address other social determinants of alcohol use.

trial registrationAustralian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (registration number: ACTRN12617000882325; date: 16 June 2017).

Indexed as

Alcohol DrinkingPregnant PeopleAustraliaFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal CareSurveys and QuestionnairesAlcohol ConsumptionAntenatal CareAustraliaIntervention studyPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID36045392
PMCPMC9429389
OpenAlexW4293747582

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.