Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046001›Full record

ArticleAffective science2022

Multivariate Brain Activity while Viewing and Reappraising Affective Scenes Does Not Predict the Multiyear Progression of Preclinical Atherosclerosis in Otherwise Healthy Midlife Adults.

Peter J Gianaros, Javier Rasero, Caitlin M DuPont, Thomas E Kraynak, James J Gross, Kateri McRae, Aidan G C Wright, Timothy D Verstynen, Emma Barinas-Mitchell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Affective science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Subjective Social Status and Longitudinal Changes in Systemic Inflammation.Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Peter J GianarosDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2313-5277
Javier RaseroDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 3131 Sennott Square, 210 S. Bouquet St, Pittsburgh, PA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1661-2856
Caitlin M DuPontDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8102-5845
Thomas E KraynakDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0510-0866
James J GrossDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3624-3090
Kateri McRaeDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver, Denver, CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6629-9733
Aidan G C WrightDepartment of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2369-0601
Timothy D VerstynenDepartment of Psychology, Carnegie Mellon University, 3131 Sennott Square, 210 S. Bouquet St, Pittsburgh, PA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4720-0336
Emma Barinas-MitchellDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7280-7781
University of Pittsburgh · USCarnegie Mellon University · USStanford University · USUniversity of Denver · US

Funding

Substrates of Threat and Reward Sensitivity and CVD RiskP01HL040962 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GIANAROS, PETER J · 1988 to 2022
$31.1M
Neurobiological pathways linking stress and emotion to atherosclerosisR01HL089850 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI GIANAROS, PETER J · 2008 to 2016
$4.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS P01 HL040962NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089850
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive reappraisal is an emotion regulation strategy that is postulated to reduce risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD), particularly the risk due to negative affect. At present, however, the brain systems and vascular pathways that may link reappraisal to CVD risk remain unclear. This study thus tested whether brain activity evoked by using reappraisal to reduce negative affect would predict the multiyear progression of a vascular marker of preclinical atherosclerosis and CVD risk: carotid artery intima-media thickness (CA-IMT). Participants were 176 otherwise healthy adults (50.6% women; aged 30-51 years) who completed a functional magnetic resonance imaging task involving the reappraisal of unpleasant scenes from the International Affective Picture System. Ultrasonography was used to compute CA-IMT at baseline and a median of 2.78 (interquartile range, 2.67 to 2.98) years later among 146 participants. As expected, reappraisal engaged brain systems implicated in emotion regulation. Reappraisal also reduced self-reported negative affect. On average, CA-IMT progressed over the follow-up period. However, multivariate and cross-validated machine-learning models demonstrated that brain activity during reappraisal failed to predict CA-IMT progression. Contrary to hypotheses, brain activity during cognitive reappraisal to reduce negative affect does not appear to forecast the progression of a vascular marker of CVD risk. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s42761-021-00098-y.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular disease riskCognitive reappraisalEmotion regulationfMRIMachine learningNegative affect

Identifiers

PMID36046001
PMCPMC9382946
OpenAlexW4213123884

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.