Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046193›Full record

ArticleiScience2022

Computational prediction and interpretation of druggable proteins using a stacked ensemble-learning framework.

Phasit Charoenkwan, Nalini Schaduangrat, Pietro Lio', Mohammad Ali Moni, Watshara Shoombuatong, Balachandran Manavalan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Target discovery and drug design in the era of artificial intelligence.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Phasit CharoenkwanModern Management and Information Technology, College of Arts, Media and Technology, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand.
Nalini SchaduangratCenter of Data Mining and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Pietro Lio'Department of Computer Science and Technology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB3 0FD, UK.
Mohammad Ali MoniArtificial Intelligence & Digital Health, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD 4072, Australia.
Watshara ShoombuatongCenter of Data Mining and Biomedical Informatics, Faculty of Medical Technology, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand.
Balachandran ManavalanComputational Biology and Bioinformatics Laboratory, Department of Integrative Biotechnology, College of Biotechnology and Bioengineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery of potential drugs requires rapid and precise identification of drug targets. Although traditional experimental methodologies can accurately identify drug targets, they are time-consuming and inappropriate for high-throughput screening. Computational approaches based on machine learning (ML) algorithms can expedite the prediction of druggable proteins; however, the performance of the existing computational methods remains unsatisfactory. This study proposes a computational tool, SPIDER, to enhance the accurate prediction of druggable proteins. SPIDER employs various feature descriptors pertaining to several aspects, including physicochemical properties, compositional information, and composition-transition-distribution information, coupled with well-known ML algorithms to facilitate the construction of the final meta-predictor. The experimental results showed that SPIDER enabled more precise and robust prediction of druggable proteins than the baseline models and current existing methods in terms of the independent test dataset. An online web server was established and made freely available online.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceArtificial intelligence applicationsComputational chemistryDrugs

Identifiers

PMID36046193
PMCPMC9421381

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.