Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36046505›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Differences in subjective well-being between individuals with distinct Joint Personality (temperament-character) networks in a Bulgarian sample.

Danilo Garcia, Maryam Kazemitabar, Kristina Stoyanova, Drozdstoy Stoyanov, C Robert Cloninger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Perceptions of Monica Geller inBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Danilo GarciaCentre for Ethics, Law and Mental Health (CELAM), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Maryam KazemitabarYale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kristina StoyanovaResearch Institute at Medical University, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
Drozdstoy StoyanovResearch Institute at Medical University, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria.
C Robert CloningerDepartment of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Medical University Plovdiv · BGLinköping University · SEUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Personality is the major predictor of people's subjective well-being ( Method: The sample consisted of 443 individuals from Bulgaria (68.70% females) with a mean age of 34 years ( Results: We found two Temperament Profiles and two Character Profiles that clustered into two distinctive Joint Personality Networks. All individuals in Joint Personality Network 1 had a Reliable (nhRP) Temperament Profile in combination with an Organized (SCt) Character Profile ( Conclusions: Although a stable temperament and a healthy character were separately important for well-being, it was clear that it was the interaction between such temperament and character configuration that yielded greater levels of subjective well-being. Nevertheless, future research needs to investigate this interaction further to evaluate other cultures with variable configurations of personality traits and values.

Indexed as

PersonalityTemperamentAdultBulgariaCharacterFemaleHumansMalePersonality InventoryAffectivityBulgariaCharacterJoint personality networksLatent class analysisLatent profile analysisLife satisfactionPersonality profilesSubjective well-beingTemperament

Identifiers

PMID36046505
PMCPMC9422977
OpenAlexW4293206596

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.