ArticleContemporary clinical trials communications2022
Dissemination trial for Health for Hearts United: Model development, preliminary outcomes and lessons learned.
Article in Contemporary clinical trials communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "Sometimes it's the bullying": an exploratory qualitative study of church leaders' perceptions of dietary health of black American children and youth.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2026Article
- The health for hearts united dissemination Trial: Implementation costs to reduce cardiovascular risk in African Americans.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Cardiovascular disease CVD), the leading cause of death in the U.S., is a particular problem for African Americans (AAs). Church-based health interventions are effective in reducing CVD risk, yet few have been successfully disseminated. This paper describes the model development, preliminary health outcomes, and lessons learned from the Health for Hearts United (HHU) dissemination trial which evolved from the longitudinal Reducing CVD Risk Study in a two-county area in North Florida. Community-based participatory research approaches and the socio-ecological model guided the study. Methods: Data for this paper were from health leaders (n = 25) in the first six churches investigated, and the outreach participants (n = 86) they engaged. Health leaders completed survey items (daily servings of fruits/vegetables [F/V], fat consumption [FAT], and daily minutes of physical activity [PA]) and clinical measures (body mass index [BMI]; waist, hip and abdomen circumferences; and systolic and diastolic blood pressure [BP]). For outreach participants, a brief CVD Awareness Quiz was administered. Data were analyzed using description statistics, Pearson correlations, and repeated measures analysis of variance. Results: Findings showed that the dissemination model was implemented by 100% of the churches, and resulted in health outcomes changes for health leaders (significant increases between pre- and post-test in F/V; significant decreases in FAT, BMI, abdomen circumference, with educational level and marital status as selected significant covariates) and in a significant increase in CVD awareness for outreach participants. Lessons learned are discussed. Although preliminary, the results suggest that the HHU dissemination model has promise for reducing CVD risk in AA's.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.