Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36052333›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Bibliometric and visual analysis of intestinal ischemia reperfusion from 2004 to 2022.

Yantong Wan, Peng Dong, Xiaobing Zhu, Yuqiong Lei, Junyi Shen, Weifeng Liu, Kexuan Liu, Xiyang Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. The Magic and Mystery of TRIM65 in Diseases.Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Scientometric analysis of electrocatalysis in wastewater treatment: today and tomorrow.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yantong WanCollege of Anesthesiology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Peng DongCollege of Anesthesiology, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiaobing ZhuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine of Zhongshan City, Zhongshan, China.
Yuqiong LeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Junyi ShenThe Second Clinical Medical College, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Weifeng LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Kexuan LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiyang ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Nan Fang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Southern Medical University · CNZhongshan Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Intestinal ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury is a common tissue-organ damage occurring in surgical practice. This study aims to comprehensively review the collaboration and impact of countries, institutions, authors, subject areas, journals, keywords, and critical literature on intestinal I/R injury from a bibliometric perspective, and to assess the evolution of clustering of knowledge structures and identify hot trends and emerging topics. Methods: Articles and reviews related to intestinal I/R were retrieved through subject search from Web of Science Core Collection. Bibliometric analyses were conducted on Excel 365, CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Bibliometrix (R-Tool of R-Studio). Results: A total of 1069 articles and reviews were included from 2004 to 2022. The number of articles on intestinal I/R injury gradually plateaued, but the number of citations increased. These publications were mainly from 985 institutions in 46 countries, led by China and the United States. Liu Kx published the most papers, while Chiu Cj had the largest number of co-citations. Analysis of the journals with the most outputs showed that most journals focused on surgical sciences, cell biology, and immunology. Macroscopic sketch and microscopic characterization of the entire knowledge domain were achieved through co-citation analysis. The roles of cell death, exosomes, intestinal flora, and anesthetics in intestinal I/R injury are the current and developing research focuses. The keywords "dexmedetomidine", "proliferation", and "ferroptosis" may also become new trends and focus of future research. Conclusion: This study comprehensively reviews the research on intestinal I/R injury using bibliometric and visualization methods, and will help scholars better understand the dynamic evolution of intestinal I/R injury and provide directions for future research.

Indexed as

bibliometricCiteSpaceintestinal ischemia reperfusionvisual analysisVOSviewer

Identifiers

PMID36052333
PMCPMC9426633
OpenAlexW4291122123

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.