Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36053711›Full record

ArticleDementia (London, England)2022

How do family carers and care-home staff manage refusals when assisting a person with advanced dementia with their personal care?

Tamara Backhouse, Yun-Hee Jeon, Anne Killett, Eneida Mioshi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Dementia (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tamara BackhouseSchool of Health Sciences, 83726University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8194-4174
Yun-Hee JeonSydney Nursing School, 4334The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Anne KillettSchool of Health Sciences, 83726University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Eneida MioshiSchool of Health Sciences, 83726University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCaregivers may encounter, or inadvertently cause, refusals of care by a care recipient. Managing refusals of care can be challenging and have potential negative consequences. We aimed to examine caregivers' (care-home staff and family carers) experiences of managing refusals of personal care in advanced dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsOne-to-one semi-structured interviews with 12 care assistants from six care homes and 20 family carers who were physically assisting a person with advanced dementia with their personal care in the UK. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim, with data analysed using qualitative content analysis.

findingsCore to the caregiver experience of refusals of care was DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Different caregiver relationships with the person with dementia influenced how they managed refusals of care. Refusals of care can place caregivers in tough situations with tensions between providing care when it is seemingly not wanted and leaving care incomplete. Both caregiver groups require support such as coaching, mentoring and/or advice from other health and social care practitioners to manage difficult personal care interactions before crisis points occur.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaCommunicationFamilyHumansQualitative ResearchSelf CareSocial Supportactivities of daily livingrejectionresistance-to-caresocial care

Identifiers

PMID36053711
PMCPMC9583289

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.