Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36056907›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2022

Population genomics of a predatory mammal reveals patterns of decline and impacts of exposure to toxic toads.

Brenton von Takach, Louis Ranjard, Christopher P Burridge, Skye F Cameron, Teigan Cremona, Mark D B Eldridge, Diana O Fisher, Stephen Frankenberg, Brydie M Hill, Rosemary Hohnen and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Brenton von TakachResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7999-3521
Louis RanjardThe Research School of Biology, Faculty of Science, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7622-4823
Christopher P BurridgeSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8185-6091
Skye F CameronAustralian Wildlife Conservancy, Kimberley, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2018-8912
Teigan CremonaResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7041-5189
Mark D B EldridgeAustralian Museum Research Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7109-0600
Diana O FisherSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4017-3710
Stephen FrankenbergSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2497-7356
Brydie M HillFlora and Fauna Division, Department of Environment, Parks and Water Security, Northern Territory Government, Northern Territory, Australia.
Rosemary HohnenResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3638-6676
Chris J JollyInstitute of Land, Water and Society, School of Environmental Science, Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5234-0897
Ella KellySchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9204-7516
Anna J MacDonaldThe Research School of Biology, Faculty of Science, The Australian National University, Acton, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2972-200X
Adnan MoussalliSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Kym OttewellDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4273-3224
Ben L PhillipsSchool of BioSciences, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ian J RadfordDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Peter B S SpencerEnvironmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4938-2615
Gavin J TrewellaResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5875-6378
Linette S UmbrelloDepartment of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2769-8464
Sam C BanksResearch Institute for the Environment and Livelihoods, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2415-0057

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mammal declines across northern Australia are one of the major biodiversity loss events occurring globally. There has been no regional assessment of the implications of these species declines for genomic diversity. To address this, we conducted a species-wide assessment of genomic diversity in the northern quoll (Dasyurus hallucatus), an Endangered marsupial carnivore. We used next generation sequencing methods to genotype 10,191 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 352 individuals from across a 3220-km length of the continent, investigating patterns of population genomic structure and diversity, and identifying loci showing signals of putative selection. We found strong heterogeneity in the distribution of genomic diversity across the continent, characterized by (i) biogeographical barriers driving hierarchical population structure through long-term isolation, and (ii) severe reductions in diversity resulting from population declines, exacerbated by the spread of introduced toxic cane toads (Rhinella marina). These results warn of a large ongoing loss of genomic diversity and associated adaptive capacity as mammals decline across northern Australia. Encouragingly, populations of the northern quoll established on toad-free islands by translocations appear to have maintained most of the initial genomic diversity after 16 years. By mapping patterns of genomic diversity within and among populations, and investigating these patterns in the context of population declines, we can provide conservation managers with data critical to informed decision-making. This includes the identification of populations that are candidates for genetic management, the importance of remnant island and insurance/translocated populations for the conservation of genetic diversity, and the characterization of putative evolutionarily significant units.

Indexed as

MarsupialiaMetagenomicsAnimalsAustraliaBufo marinusPredatory Behaviorbiogeographycane toaddemographic historygenomic diversitynorthern quollpopulation structure

Identifiers

PMID36056907
PMCPMC9826391

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.