Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36057093›Full record

ArticleFASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology2022

Single cell model for re-entrainment to a shifted light cycle.

Anouk W van Beurden, Robin A Schoonderwoerd, Mayke M H Tersteeg, Pablo de Torres Gutiérrez, Stephan Michel, Ruben Blommers, Jos H T Rohling, Johanna H Meijer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Single cell model for re-entrainment to a shifted light cycle.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anouk W van BeurdenDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0551-0347
Robin A SchoonderwoerdDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Mayke M H TersteegDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Pablo de Torres GutiérrezDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Stephan MichelDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ruben BlommersDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jos H T RohlingDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johanna H MeijerDepartment of Cell and Chemical Biology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Our daily 24-h rhythm is synchronized to the external light-dark cycle resulting from the Earth's daily rotation. In the mammalian brain, the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) serves as the master clock and receives light-mediated input via the retinohypothalamic tract. Abrupt changes in the timing of the light-dark cycle (e.g., due to jet lag) cause a phase shift in the circadian rhythms in the SCN. Here, we investigated the effects of a 6-h delay in the light-dark cycle on PERIOD2::LUCIFERASE expression at the single-cell level in mouse SCN organotypic explants. The ensemble pattern in phase shift response obtained from individual neurons in the anterior and central SCN revealed a bimodal distribution; specifically, neurons in the ventrolateral SCN responded with a rapid phase shift, while neurons in the dorsal SCN generally did not respond to the shift in the light-dark cycle. We also stimulated the hypothalamic tract in acute SCN slices to simulate light-mediated input to the SCN; interestingly, we found similarities between the distribution and fraction of rapid shifting neurons (in response to the delay) and neurons that were excited in response to electrical stimulation. These results suggest that a subpopulation of neurons in the ventral SCN that have an excitatory response to light input, shift their clock more readily than dorsal located neurons, and initiate the SCN's entrainment to the new light-dark cycle. Thus, we propose that light-excited neurons in the anterior and central SCN play an important role in the organism's ability to adjust to changes in the external light-dark cycle.

Indexed as

PhotoperiodSuprachiasmatic NucleusAnimalsCircadian RhythmLightLuciferasesMammalsMiceNeuronsLuciferasesentrainmentPER2phase shiftretinohypothalamic tractsuprachiasmatic nucleus

Identifiers

PMID36057093
PMCPMC9543151
OpenAlexW4294433428

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.