Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36058943›Full record

SynthesisArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2023

Polycystic ovarian syndrome and miscarriage in IVF: systematic revision of the literature and meta-analysis.

Roberto Matorras, Jose Ignacio Pijoan, Lucía Laínz, María Díaz-Nuñez, Héctor Sainz, Silvia Pérez-Fernandez, Dayana Moreira

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [A Study on the Association Between Various Insulin Resistance Assessment Indices and IVF-ET Outcomes in Patients With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Roberto MatorrasHuman Reproduction Unit, Hospital de Cruces, Biocruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain. roberto.matorras@osakidetza.eus.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4279-6823
Jose Ignacio PijoanClinical Epidemiology Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Biocruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
Lucía LaínzHuman Reproduction Unit, Hospital de Cruces, Biocruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
María Díaz-NuñezHuman Reproduction Unit, Hospital de Cruces, Biocruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9661-715X
Héctor SainzHuman Reproduction Unit, Hospital de Cruces, Biocruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
Silvia Pérez-FernandezClinical Epidemiology Unit, Cruces University Hospital, Biocruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
Dayana MoreiraHuman Reproduction Unit, Hospital de Cruces, Biocruces, Baracaldo, Vizcaya, Spain.
Hospital de Cruces · ESBioCruces Health research Institute · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the risk of miscarriage in IVF cycles in women with PCOS.

methodsSystematic review and meta-analysis. Systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE and Google Scholar. The language search was restricted to English, Spanish and French, from 2000 to 2019, with crosschecking of references from relevant articles. Inclusion criteria were: (1) IVF cycles (2) a group of patients with PCOS was considered separately, (3) the miscarriage rate was reported, (4) there was a control group, (5) definition of PCOS according the Rotterdam criteria. Exclusion criteria were been excluded from the meta-analysis: (1) publication prior to the year 2000, (2) animal studies, (3) reviews, (4) abstracts or conference papers, (5) letters, (6) case reports, (7) studies comparing different IVF techniques, (8) studies comparing groups with and without metformin or other treatments, (9) studies on induced abortions. Risk of bias was assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa score (NOS). All the included studies had a low risk of bias (NOS scores ranging 7-8). The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020186713). Seventeen studies were included in the meta-analysis. There was a total of 10,472 pregnancies (2650 in PCOS and 7822 in controls) of which 1885 were miscarriages (682 in PCOS and 1203 in controls). We considered the miscarriage rate (MR), preclinical MR, early MR, and late MR.

resultsIn IVF pregnancies the risk of miscarriage was significantly increased when considering miscarriages in total (RR = 1.59; CI = 1.45-1.75), preclinical miscarriages (RR = 1.59; CI = 1.35-1.88), and early miscarriages (RR = 1.44; CI = 1.16-1.79). The increased miscarriage rate persisted in Chinese and Western populations when considered separately. The risk of miscarriage was increased in the subgroup of fresh transfers (RR = 1.21; CI = 1.06-1.39) as well as in the subgroup including either fresh or frozen transfers (RR = 1.95; CI = 1.72-2.22).

conclusionPCOS is linked to an increased MR in IVF pregnancies both of miscarriages in total, and to an increase in preclinical and early miscarriages. PROSPERO NUMBER: CRD42020186713.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousMetforminPolycystic Ovary SyndromeFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansPregnancyPregnancy RateMetforminEarly miscarriageIVFLate miscarriageMiscarriagePCOSPolycystic ovarian syndromePreclinical miscarriage

Identifiers

PMID36058943
OpenAlexW4294564713

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.