Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36059196›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2022

Multimodal microscale mechanical mapping of cancer cells in complex microenvironments.

Miloš Nikolić, Giuliano Scarcelli, Kandice Tanner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Macrophages Mediate Mesoscale Brain Mechanical Homeostasis.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026
    Article
  5. Brillouin microscopy in cancer research: a review.Journal of biomedical optics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mechanical Evolution of Metastatic Cancer Cells in 3D Microenvironment.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Stimulated Brillouin scattering flow cytometry.Biomedical optics express · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Brillouin microscopy.Nature reviews. Methods primers · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Miloš NikolićLaboratory of Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland; Maryland Biophysics Program, IPST, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Giuliano ScarcelliMaryland Biophysics Program, IPST, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland; Fischell Department of Bioengineering, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland.
Kandice TannerLaboratory of Cell Biology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland. Electronic address: kandice.tanner@nih.gov.
Center for Cancer Research · USNational Cancer Institute · USUniversity of Maryland, College Park · US

Funding

Stimulated Brillouin Flow Cytometry for biomechanical assessment of metastatic potentialR21CA258008 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI KONSTANTOPOULOS, KONSTANTINOS, MARTIN, STUART S · 2022 to 2023
$543k
NCI NIH HHS R21 CA258008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanical phenotype of the cell is critical for survival following deformations due to confinement and fluid flow. One idea is that cancer cells are plastic and adopt different mechanical phenotypes under different geometries that aid in their survival. Thus, an attractive goal is to disrupt cancer cells' ability to adopt multiple mechanical states. To begin to address this question, we aimed to quantify the diversity of these mechanical states using in vitro biomimetics to mimic in vivo two-dimensional (2D) and 3D extracellular matrix environments. Here, we used two modalities Brillouin microscopy (∼GHz) and broadband frequency (7-15 kHz) optical tweezer microrheology to measure microscale cell mechanics. We measured the response of intracellular mechanics of cancer cells cultured in 2D and 3D environments where we modified substrate stiffness, dimensionality (2D versus 3D), and presence of fibrillar topography. We determined that there was good agreement between two modalities despite the difference in timescale of the two measurements. These findings on cell mechanical phenotype in different environments confirm a correlation between modalities that employ different mechanisms at different temporal scales (Hz-kHz versus GHz). We also determined that observed heterogeneity in cell shape is more closely linked to the cells' mechanical state. Moreover, individual cells in multicellular spheroids exhibit a lower degree of mechanical heterogeneity when compared with single cells cultured in monodisperse 3D cultures. The observed decreased heterogeneity among cells in spheroids suggested that there is mechanical cooperativity between cells that make up a single spheroid.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsSpheroids, CellularBiomimeticsExtracellular MatrixPlasticsPlastics

Identifiers

PMID36059196
PMCPMC9617162
OpenAlexW4294666885

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.