ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Evaluation of aliphatic acid metabolism in bladder cancer with the goal of guiding therapeutic treatment.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Metabolic Reprogramming in Urological Tumors: New Perspectives from Tumor Metabolic Phenotypes to Therapeutic Targets.International journal of biological sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urothelial bladder cancer (BLCA) is a common internal malignancy with a poor prognosis. The re-programming of lipid metabolism is necessary for cancer cell growth, proliferation, angiogenesis and invasion. However, the role of aliphatic acid metabolism genes in bladder cancer patients has not been explored. The samples' gene expression and clinicopathological data were obtained from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Univariate, multivariate, and LASSO Cox regression were used to develop a BLCA prognostic model. GSVA was used to assess function, whereas pRRophetic was used to assess chemotherapeutic drug sensitivity. The twelve-gene signature may define the tumor immune milieu, according to the risk score model. We compared the expression of aliphatic acid metabolism genes in malignant and non-cancerous tissues and chose 90 with a false discovery rate of 0.05 for The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort. The prognostic risk score model can effectively predict BLCA OS. A nomogram including age, clinical T stage, gender, grade, pathological stage, and clinical M stage was developed as an independent BLCA prognostic predictor. The halfmaximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) was used to assess chemotherapeutic medication response. Sorafenib and Pyrimethamine were used to treat patients with low risk scores more sensitively than patients with high risk scores. Immunotherapy candidates with CMS1 exhibited higher risk ratings. The aliphatic acid prognostic risk score model can assess metabolic trends. Clinical stage and molecular subtype may be used to categorize individuals using the risk score.With this new paradigm, future cancer treatment and immunotherapy may be tailored to the patient's exact requirements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.