Evidence mapPaperPMID 36059947Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Molecular mechanisms of programmed cell death in methamphetamine-induced neuronal damage.

Dongming Guo, Xinlei Huang, Tianqing Xiong, Xingyi Wang, Jingwen Zhang, Yingge Wang, Jingyan Liang

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dongming GuoInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Xinlei HuangInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Tianqing XiongInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Xingyi WangInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Jingwen ZhangInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Yingge WangDepartment of Neurology, Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.
Jingyan LiangInstitute of Translational Medicine, Medical, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methamphetamine, commonly referred to as METH, is a highly addictive psychostimulant and one of the most commonly misused drugs on the planet. Using METH continuously can increase your risk for drug addiction, along with other health complications like attention deficit disorder, memory loss, and cognitive decline. Neurotoxicity caused by METH is thought to play a significant role in the onset of these neurological complications. The molecular mechanisms responsible for METH-caused neuronal damage are discussed in this review. According to our analysis, METH is closely associated with programmed cell death (PCD) in the process that causes neuronal impairment, such as apoptosis, autophagy, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis. In reviewing this article, some insights are gained into how METH addiction is accompanied by cell death and may help to identify potential therapeutic targets for the neurological impairment caused by METH abuse.

Indexed as

apoptosisautophagyferroptosismethamphetaminenecroptosispyroptosis

Identifiers

PMID36059947
PMCPMC9428134

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.