ReviewFood science and biotechnology2022
Application of DNA barcoding for ensuring food safety and quality.
Review in Food science and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete Mitochondrial Genomes and Evolutionary Insights of Two Commercially Farmed Edible Crickets (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Digital PCR for the Authentication of KAMUTFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review of Technological Advances in Meat Safety, Quality, and Sustainability for Public Health.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Development of a Rapid and Cost-Effective Multiplex PCR Assay for the Simultaneous Identification of Three Commercially Important Sea Squirt Species (Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A universal DNA microarray for rapid fish species authentication.Food chemistry. Molecular sciences · 2025Article
- EAVLD 2024 - 7Italian journal of food safety · 2024Article
- How Helpful May Be a CRISPR/Cas-Based System for Food Traceability?Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Molecular Rapid Test for Identification of Tuna Species.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Fish DNA Sensors for Authenticity Assessment-Application to Sardine Species Identification.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Article
- Mitochondrial Analysis of Sparidae Species to Detect a New DNA Barcoding Marker forFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With increasing international food trade, food quality and safety are high priority worldwide. The consumption of contaminated and adulterated food can cause serious health problems such as infectious diseases and allergies. Therefore, the authentication and traceability systems are needed to improve food safety. The mitochondrial DNA can be used for species authentication of food and food products. Effective DNA barcode markers have been developed to correctly identify species. The US FDA approved to the use of DNA barcoding for various food products. The DNA barcoding technology can be used as a regulatory tool for identification and authenticity. The application of DNA barcoding can reduce the microbiological and toxicological risks associated with the consumption of food and food products. DNA barcoding can be a gold-standard method in food authenticity and fraud detection. This review describes the DNA barcoding method for preventing food fraud and adulteration in meat, fish, and medicinal plants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.