Evidence mapPaperPMID 36060955Full record

Trial reportFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Comparison of empagliflozin and vildagliptin for efficacy and safety in type 2 diabetes mellitus in the Pakistani population.

Asima Khan, Izhan A Khan, Hussain Abidi, Mansoor Ahmed

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldFull text readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT05359432. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05359432 phase4completed

Comparison of Empaglifozin and Vildagliptin in Efficacy and Safety in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Ran2020Enrolled120Registered outcomes10Posted comparisons0ConditionsType 2 DiabetesArmsempagliflozin, vildagliptin
Open the trial in the graph
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asima KhanSchool of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Izhan A KhanDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Hussain AbidiClinical Research Operations, Getz Pharma, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mansoor AhmedSchool of Public Health, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Dow University of Health Sciences · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease that needs early management to prevent complications and premature mortality. Therefore, it is essential to select evidence-based drugs available to control diabetes and limit the progression to related complications. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of empagliflozin and vildagliptin in people with type 2 DM. Methods: This was an open-label, parallel randomized controlled trial (NCT05359432) conducted at two tertiary care hospitals in Karachi, Pakistan. After obtaining consent, participants were randomized into two groups. The first group was given empagliflozin (10 mg once or two times daily) with metformin, and the second group got vildagliptin (50 mg once or two times daily) with metformin. HbA1c, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, systolic blood pressure, fasting blood glucose, and body weight were measured at the baseline and 24-week visits. Results: A total of 120 patients fulfilled the selection criteria and then underwent randomization to be placed into empagliflozin and vildagliptin groups. The mean change in HbA1c (-0.97% ± 0.68 for empagliflozin and -0.82% ± 1.57 for vildagliptin) was statistically similar in both groups (p-value = 0.980). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups for safety parameters such as eGFR (p = 0.46), serum ALT (p = 0.13), LDL (p = 0.23), total cholesterol (p = 0.49), and triglycerides (p = 0.49). Conclusion: Results of the study highlight that vildagliptin and empagliflozin have a significant beneficial effect in reducing HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, systolic blood pressure, and weight of participants. Both drugs had no differences when compared on safety parameters.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2MetforminBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucoseGlucosidesGlycated HemoglobinHumansHypoglycemic AgentsPakistanVildagliptinBenzhydryl CompoundsBlood GlucoseempagliflozinGlucosidesGlycated HemoglobinHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminVildagliptinefficacyempagliflozinsafetytype 2 diabetes mellitusvildagliptin

Identifiers

PMID36060955
PMCPMC9428695
OpenAlexW4292267777

What Socratic holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.