Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36062166›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Research on Translation of Chinese Medicine Constitution (Tizhi) Academic Terms: Based on Memetics and Delphi Method.

Siying Dong, Zixuan Zhao, Wenle Li, Yuyang Cai, Ziling Zhang, Minghua Bai, Ji Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Metabolite Comparison between Spleen-Deficiency and Healthy Children.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Siying DongResearch Center of TCM Constitution and Reproductive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5038-7643
Zixuan ZhaoResearch Center of TCM Constitution and Reproductive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5446-4818
Wenle LiResearch Center of TCM Constitution and Reproductive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8430-4164
Yuyang CaiResearch Center of TCM Constitution and Reproductive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5211-6043
Ziling ZhangResearch Center of TCM Constitution and Reproductive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6769-6722
Minghua BaiResearch Center of TCM Constitution and Reproductive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4989-6560
Ji WangResearch Center of TCM Constitution and Reproductive Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1844-8220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: With the continuous in-depth research of Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi) and the continuous expansion of cross research with new disciplines, internationalization will become the future trend of Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi). Translating the terms of Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi) into English is the first step for Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi) to go international. Language memes play an important role in information transmission in social interpersonal communication activities. The continuous replication and dissemination of translation memes make language spread and popularized. Because there is no fixed translation method at present, based on the particularity of Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi), we decided to use the Delphi method to complete the term translation research. Objective: The purpose of this study is to provide a standard and unified translation method for terms of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) constitution with Chinese characteristics through the Delphi expert consultation strategy. Methods: Forward translation and expert consensus were conducted to complete this study. We sorted out the related terms of Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi) theory and invited an expert from the World Federation of Chinese Medicine Societies (WFCMS) to complete the initial forward translation. An expert of Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi) theory joined this process. Then, we invite relevant professionals to evaluate this translation version using the Delphi method. Results: Following a 3-round Delphi survey, the translation criteria of 61 (92.42%) terms were unified, and 5 terms resulted in no consensus and reached consensus on the translation method of Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi) theory. A major problem about how to translate "" is identified. 25 experts participated in this study, and the drop-out rate is 0% in the 3-round Delphi survey. Translation challenges include the following: (1) translation methods of "Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi) theory"; (2) experts' understanding deviation on the definitions of some terms. Conclusions: The average mode, full score ratio, standard deviation, coefficient of variation, and variation ratio of expert scores are analyzed. The diversity of regions and professional titles of experts shows that they have a high degree of authority. The scores of terms indicate the consistent of study results, so they can be used as a reference for the translation of Chinese medicine constitution (tizhi) theory.

Identifiers

PMID36062166
PMCPMC9433282

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.