Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36062962›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of radiology2023

Challenges and opportunities for advanced neuroimaging of glioblastoma.

Dylan Henssen, Frederick Meijer, Frederik A Verburg, Marion Smits

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of radiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Development and validation of a multi-modality fusion deep learning model for differentiating glioblastoma from solitary brain metastases.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dylan HenssenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3915-3034
Frederick MeijerDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frederik A VerburgDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marion SmitsDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive of glial tumours in adults. On conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, these tumours are observed as irregular enhancing lesions with areas of infiltrating tumour and cortical expansion. More advanced imaging techniques including diffusion-weighted MRI, perfusion-weighted MRI, MR spectroscopy and positron emission tomography (PET) imaging have found widespread application to diagnostic challenges in the setting of first diagnosis, treatment planning and follow-up. This review aims to educate readers with regard to the strengths and weaknesses of the clinical application of these imaging techniques. For example, this review shows that the (semi)quantitative analysis of the mentioned advanced imaging tools was found useful for assessing tumour aggressiveness and tumour extent, and aids in the differentiation of tumour progression from treatment-related effects. Although these techniques may aid in the diagnostic work-up and (post-)treatment phase of glioblastoma, so far no unequivocal imaging strategy is available. Furthermore, the use and further development of artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools could greatly enhance neuroradiological practice by automating labour-intensive tasks such as tumour measurements, and by providing additional diagnostic information such as prediction of tumour genotype. Nevertheless, due to the fact that advanced imaging and AI-diagnostics is not part of response assessment criteria, there is no harmonised guidance on their use, while at the same time the lack of standardisation severely hampers the definition of uniform guidelines.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsGlioblastomaGliomaAdultArtificial IntelligenceHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuroimaging

Identifiers

PMID36062962
PMCPMC10997013

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.