Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066649›Full record

SynthesisCancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII2023

Intratumoral pro-oxidants promote cancer immunotherapy by recruiting and reprogramming neutrophils to eliminate tumors.

Stephen John Ralph, Maxwell J Reynolds

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Enzymatic microbubble robots.Nature nanotechnology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Targeting catalase in cancer.Redox biology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. The Multifaceted Roles of NRF2 in Cancer: Friend or Foe?Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Stephen John RalphSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, Gold Coast campus, Southport, QLD, 4222, Australia. s.ralph@griffith.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4335-092X
Maxwell J Reynolds98 Alive Pty Ltd, 5 Ridgeline Court, Kuraby, Queensland, 4112, Australia.
Griffith University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neutrophils have recently gained recognition for their potential in the fight against cancer. Neutrophil plasticity between the N1 anti-tumor and N2 pro-tumor subtypes is now apparent, as is the ability to polarize these individual subtypes by interventions such as intratumoral injection of various agents including bacterial products or pro-oxidants. Metabolic responses and the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) such as hydrogen peroxide act as potent chemoattractants and activators of N1 neutrophils that facilitates their recruitment and ensuing activation of a toxic respiratory burst in tumors. Greater understanding of the precise mechanism of N1 neutrophil activation, recruitment and regulation is now needed to fully exploit their anti-tumor potential against cancers both locally and at distant sites. This systematic review critically analyzes these new developments in cancer immunotherapy.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsNeutrophilsHumansImmunotherapyReactive Oxygen SpeciesRespiratory BurstReactive Oxygen SpeciesCancer immunotherapyIntratumoralN1 and N2 neutrophilsPro-oxidantsReactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID36066649
PMCPMC9446783
OpenAlexW4294732770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.