Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066651›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2022

Efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide in treating SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials.

Paulo Ricardo Martins-Filho, Edmundo Marques do Nascimento-Júnior, José Antônio Barreto-Alves, Ricardo Fakhouri, Lis Campos Ferreira

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paulo Ricardo Martins-FilhoInvestigative Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Sergipe, Rua Cláudio Batista, s/n. Bairro Sanatório, Aracaju, Sergipe, 49060-100, Brazil. prmartinsfh@gmail.com.
Edmundo Marques do Nascimento-JúniorInvestigative Pathology Laboratory, Federal University of Sergipe, Rua Cláudio Batista, s/n. Bairro Sanatório, Aracaju, Sergipe, 49060-100, Brazil.
José Antônio Barreto-AlvesDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.
Ricardo FakhouriDepartment of Medicine, Federal University of Sergipe, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.
Lis Campos FerreiraDepartment of Medicine, Tiradentes University, Aracaju, Sergipe, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Sergipe · BRUniversidade Tiradentes · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNitazoxanide is a broad-spectrum antiparasitic that has been tested for COVID-19 due to its anti-inflammatory effects and in vitro antiviral activity. This study synthesized the best evidence on the efficacy and safety of nitazoxanide in COVID-19.

methodsSearches for studies were performed in peer-reviewed and grey-literature from January 1, 2020 to May 23, 2022. The following elements were used to define eligibility criteria: (1) Population: individuals with COVID-19; (2) Intervention: nitazoxanide; (3) Comparison: placebo; (4) Outcomes: primary outcome was death, and secondary outcomes were viral load, positive RT-PCR status, serum biomarkers of inflammation, composite measure of disease progression (ICU admission or invasive mechanical ventilation), and any adverse events; (5) Study type: blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trials (RCTs). Treatment effects were reported as relative risk (RR) for dichotomous variables and standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsFive blinded, placebo-controlled RCTs were included and enrolled individuals with mild or moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection. We found no difference between nitazoxanide and placebo in reducing viral load (SMD =  - 0.16; 95% CI - 0.38 to 0.05) and the frequency of positive RTP-PCR results (RR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.81 to 1.06). In addition, there was no decreased risk for disease progression (RR = 0.63; 95% CI 0.38 to 1.04) and death (RR = 0.81; 95% CI 0.36 to 1.78) among patients receiving nitazoxanide. Patients with COVID-19 treated with nitazoxanide had decreased levels of white blood cells (SMD =  - 0.15; 95% - 0.29 to - 0.02), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) (SMD - 0.32; 95% - 0.52 to - 0.13), and D-dimer (SMD - 0.49; 95% CI - 0.68 to - 0.31) compared to placebo, but the magnitude of effect was considered small to moderate.

conclusionThis systematic review showed no evidence of clinical benefits of the use of nitazoxanide to treat patients with mild or moderate COVID-19. In addition, we found a reduction in WBC, LDH, and D-dimer levels among nitazoxanide-treated patients, but the effect size was considered small to moderate.

Indexed as

COVID-19 Drug TreatmentAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntiparasitic AgentsAntiviral AgentsDisease ProgressionHumansLactate DehydrogenasesNitro CompoundsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSARS-CoV-2ThiazolesAnti-Inflammatory AgentsAntiparasitic AgentsAntiviral AgentsLactate DehydrogenasesnitazoxanideNitro CompoundsThiazolesCOVID-19Meta-analysisNitazoxanideSARS-CoV-2 infection

Identifiers

PMID36066651
PMCPMC9446612
OpenAlexW4294710687

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.