Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36066837›Full record

ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2022

Smart-working policies during COVID-19 pandemic: a way to reduce work-related traumas?

Giuseppe Stirparo, Aurea Oradini-Alacreu, Carlo Signorelli, Giuseppe Maria Sechi, Alberto Zoli, Nazzareno Fagoni

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Changing the stroke network during pandemic scenarios does not affect the management of patients with a positive Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Observational
  7. SIMED-New Doc course, a matter of reflection.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Giuseppe StirparoSchool of Public Health, University of Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Aurea Oradini-AlacreuSchool of Public Health, University of Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Carlo SignorelliSchool of Public Health, University of Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Maria SechiAgenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza Headquarters (AREU HQ), Milan, Italy.
Alberto ZoliAgenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza Headquarters (AREU HQ), Milan, Italy.
Nazzareno FagoniAAT Brescia, Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (AREU), ASST Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy. nazzareno.fagoni@unibs.it.ORCID 0000-0002-7312-8174

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eighth of March 2020, the Italian government introduced a national lockdown to counter the exponential increase in the number of COVID-19 cases; this decision avoided putting a strain on the health system. During the lockdown all non-essential services were stopped and a "stay at home" order was imposed. The purpose is to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on Emergency Department (ED) visits due to work-related traumas in the Lombardy region. We performed a retrospective analysis on trauma admissions to the ED registered through the regional portal (EUOL), from 1st January 2019 to 31st December 2019 and from 1st January 2020 to 31st December 2020. The number of ED admissions for traumatic injury and work-related traumas dropped by 32% between 2019 and 2020. A remarkable reduction of work-related traumas was recorded during the two pandemic waves, from March to June and in October and November. The percentage of patient in critical condition in ED slightly raised. These results are probably a consequence of the unprecedented measures imposed by the Italian government to cope with the spread of COVID-19, with important implications for work contexts. This analysis should be considered to optimise the organisation of the emergency system in other critical scenarios. We speculate that the different epidemiology of occupational injuries during the lockdown period is a consequence of smart-working policies that can be held responsible for the drastic reduction of work-related traumas.

Indexed as

COVID-19Communicable Disease ControlEmergency Service, HospitalHumansPandemicsPolicyRetrospective Studiesemergency departmentLockdownTraumaTraumatic occupational injuries

Identifiers

PMID36066837
PMCPMC9446625

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.