Evidence mapPaperPMID 36069110Full record

ArticleESC heart failure2022

Sex-based differences in referral of heart failure patients to outpatient clinics: a scoping review.

Elizabeth Chan, Jasjit Rooprai, Jillian Rodger, Sarah Visintini, Norvinda Rodger, Shona Philip, Lisa Mielniczuk, Louise Y Sun

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in ESC heart failure, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Elizabeth ChanDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4389-7191
Jasjit RoopraiDepartment of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jillian RodgerDepartment of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sarah VisintiniBerkman Library, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Norvinda RodgerClinical Services, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Shona PhilipDepartment of Blood and Marrow Transplant, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, California, USA.
Lisa MielniczukDivision of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Louise Y SunDivision of Cardiac Anesthesiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
University of Ottawa · CAStanford Blood Center · USUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGuidelines recommend that hospitalized patients newly diagnosed with HF be referred to an outpatient HF clinic (HFC) within 2 weeks of discharge. Our study aims were (i) to assess the current literary landscape on the impact of patient sex on HFC referral and outcomes and (ii) to provide a qualitative overview of possible considerations for the impact of sex on referral patterns and HF characteristics including aetiology, symptom severity, investigations undertaken and pharmacologic therapy. METHODS AND

resultsWe conducted a scoping review using the Arksey and O'Malley framework and searched Medline, EMBASE, PsychINFO, Cochrane Library, Ageline databases and grey literature. Eligible articles included index HF hospitalizations or presentations to the Emergency Department (ED), a description of the HFC referral of patients not previously followed by an HF specialist and sex-specific analysis. Of the 11 372 potential studies, 8 met the inclusion criteria. These studies reported on a total of 11 484 participants, with sample sizes ranging between 168 and 3909 (25.6%-50.7% female). The included studies were divided into two groups: (i) those outlining the referral process to an HFC and (ii) studies which include patients newly enrolled in an HFC. Of the studies in Group 1, males (51%-82.4%) were more frequently referred to an HFC compared with females (29%-78.1%). Studies in Group 2 enrolled a higher proportion of males (62%-74% vs. 26%-38%). One study identified independent predictors of HFC referral which included male sex, younger age, and the presence of systolic dysfunction, the latter two more often found in males. Two studies, one from each group reported a higher mortality amongst males compared with females, whereas another study from Group 2 reported a higher hospitalization rate amongst females following HFC assessment.

conclusionsMales were more likely than females to be referred to HFCs after hospitalization and visits to the Emergency Department, however heterogeneity across studies precluded a robust assessment of sex-based differences in outcomes. This highlights the need for more comprehensive longitudinal data on HF patients discharged from the acute care setting to better understand the role of sex on patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHospitalizationAmbulatory Care FacilitiesFemaleHumansMalePatient DischargeReferral and ConsultationHeart failureOutpatient clinicSex-differences

Identifiers

PMID36069110
PMCPMC9773741
OpenAlexW4294922059

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.