Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36069120›Full record

ArticleCatheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions2022

Development and validation of a prediction model for early mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) based on the Netherlands Heart Registration (NHR): The TAVI-NHR risk model.

Hatem Al-Farra, Anita C J Ravelli, José P S Henriques, Saskia Houterman, Bas A J M de Mol, Ameen Abu-Hanna, NHR THI Registration Committee

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hatem Al-FarraDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5538-4660
Anita C J RavelliDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
José P S HenriquesHeart Centre, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8969-7929
Saskia HoutermanNetherlands Heart Registration, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Bas A J M de MolHeart Centre, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6888-9430
Ameen Abu-HannaDepartment of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam UMC, Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
NHR THI Registration Committee
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLGGD Amsterdam · NLNetherlands Heart Registration · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe currently available mortality prediction models (MPM) have suboptimal performance when predicting early mortality (30-days) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) on various external populations. We developed and validated a new TAVI-MPM based on a large number of predictors with recent data from a national heart registry.

methodsWe included all TAVI-patients treated in the Netherlands between 2013 and 2018, from the Netherlands Heart Registration. We used logistic-regression analysis based on the Akaike Information Criterion for variable selection. We multiply imputed missing values, but excluded variables with >30% missing values. For internal validation, we used ten-fold cross-validation. For temporal (prospective) validation, we used the 2018-data set for testing. We assessed discrimination by the c-statistic, predicted probability accuracy by the Brier score, and calibration by calibration graphs, and calibration-intercept and calibration slope. We compared our new model to the updated ACC-TAVI and IRRMA MPMs on our population.

resultsWe included 9144 TAVI-patients. The observed early mortality was 4.0%. The final MPM had 10 variables, including: critical-preoperative state, procedure-acuteness, body surface area, serum creatinine, and diabetes-mellitus status. The median c-statistic was 0.69 (interquartile range [IQR] 0.646-0.75). The median Brier score was 0.038 (IQR 0.038-0.040). No signs of miscalibration were observed. The c-statistic's temporal-validation was 0.71 (95% confidence intervals 0.64-0.78). Our model outperformed the updated currently available MPMs ACC-TAVI and IRRMA (p value < 0.05).

conclusionThe new TAVI-model used additional variables and showed fair discrimination and good calibration. It outperformed the updated currently available TAVI-models on our population. The model's good calibration benefits preprocedural risk-assessment and patient counseling.

Indexed as

Aortic Valve StenosisTranscatheter Aortic Valve ReplacementAortic ValveHumansNetherlandsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsTreatment Outcomeaortic stenosisinternal validationmortalityprediction modeltranscatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

Identifiers

PMID36069120
PMCPMC9826169
OpenAlexW4294919931

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.