Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072795›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Deep learning models for predicting the survival of patients with chondrosarcoma based on a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis.

Lizhao Yan, Nan Gao, Fangxing Ai, Yingsong Zhao, Yu Kang, Jianghai Chen, Yuxiong Weng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lizhao YanDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Nan GaoDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Fangxing AiDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yingsong ZhaoDepartment of Orthopaedics, Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yu KangDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jianghai ChenDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Yuxiong WengDepartment of Hand Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate prediction of prognosis is critical for therapeutic decisions in chondrosarcoma patients. Several prognostic models have been created utilizing multivariate Cox regression or binary classification-based machine learning approaches to predict the 3- and 5-year survival of patients with chondrosarcoma, but few studies have investigated the results of combining deep learning with time-to-event prediction. Compared with simplifying the prediction as a binary classification problem, modeling the probability of an event as a function of time by combining it with deep learning can provide better accuracy and flexibility. Materials and methods: Patients with the diagnosis of chondrosarcoma between 2000 and 2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry. Three algorithms-two based on neural networks (DeepSurv, neural multi-task logistic regression [NMTLR]) and one on ensemble learning (random survival forest [RSF])-were selected for training. Meanwhile, a multivariate Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) model was also constructed for comparison. The dataset was randomly divided into training and testing datasets at a ratio of 7:3. Hyperparameter tuning was conducted through a 1000-repeated random search with 5-fold cross-validation on the training dataset. The model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C-index), Brier score, and Integrated Brier Score (IBS). The accuracy of predicting 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year survival was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC), calibration curves, and the area under the ROC curves (AUC). Results: A total of 3145 patients were finally enrolled in our study. The mean age at diagnosis was 52 ± 18 years, 1662 of the 3145 patients were male (53%), and mean survival time was 83 ± 67 months. Two deep learning models outperformed the RSF and classical CoxPH models, with the C-index on test datasets achieving values of 0.832 (DeepSurv) and 0.821 (NMTLR). The DeepSurv model produced better accuracy and calibrated survival estimates in predicting 1-, 3- 5- and 10-year survival (AUC:0.895-0.937). We deployed the DeepSurv model as a web application for use in clinical practice; it can be accessed through https://share.streamlit.io/whuh-ml/chondrosarcoma/Predict/app.py. Conclusions: Time-to-event prediction models based on deep learning algorithms are successful in predicting chondrosarcoma prognosis, with DeepSurv producing the best discriminative performance and calibration.

Indexed as

chondrosarcomadeep learningDeepSurvmachine learningsurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID36072795
PMCPMC9442032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.