Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36072946›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022

Effects of growth trajectory of shock index within 24 h on the prognosis of patients with sepsis.

Fengshuo Xu, Luming Zhang, Tao Huang, Didi Han, Rui Yang, Shuai Zheng, Aozi Feng, Liying Huang, Haiyan Yin, Jun Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Fengshuo XuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Luming ZhangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Tao HuangDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Didi HanSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Rui YangSchool of Public Health, Xi'an Jiaotong University Health Science Center, Xi'an, China.
Shuai ZhengSchool of Public Health, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, China.
Aozi FengDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Liying HuangDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Haiyan YinDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
Jun LyuDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sepsis is a serious disease with high clinical morbidity and mortality. Despite the tremendous advances in medicine and nursing, treatment of sepsis remains a huge challenge. Our purpose was to explore the effects of shock index (SI) trajectory changes on the prognosis of patients within 24 h after the diagnosis of sepsis. Methods: This study was based on Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC- IV). The effects of SI on the prognosis of patients with sepsis were investigated using C-index and restricted cubic spline (RCS). The trajectory of SI in 24 h after sepsis diagnosis was classified by latent growth mixture modeling (LGMM). Cox proportional hazard model, double robust analysis, and subgroup analysis were conducted to investigate the influence of SI trajectory on in-hospital death and secondary outcomes. Results: A total of 19,869 patients were eventually enrolled in this study. C-index showed that SI had a prognostic value independent of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment for patients with sepsis. Moreover, the results of RCS showed that SI was a prognostic risk factor. LGMM divided SI trajectory into seven classes, and patients with sepsis in different classes had notable differences in prognosis. Compared with the SI continuously at a low level of 0.6, the SI continued to be at a level higher than 1.0, and the patients in the class whose initial SI was at a high level of 1.2 and then declined had a worse prognosis. Furthermore, the trajectory of SI had a higher prognostic value than the initial SI. Conclusion: Both initial SI and trajectory of SI were found to be independent factors that affect the prognosis of patients with sepsis. Therefore, in clinical treatment, we should closely monitor the basic vital signs of patients and arrive at appropriate clinical decisions on basis of their change trajectory.

Indexed as

growth trajectorylatent growth mixture modelingprognosissepsisshock index

Identifiers

PMID36072946
PMCPMC9441919

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.