Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36075912›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2022

Model-informed experimental design recommendations for distinguishing intrinsic and acquired targeted therapeutic resistance in head and neck cancer.

Santiago D Cárdenas, Constance J Reznik, Ruchira Ranaweera, Feifei Song, Christine H Chung, Elana J Fertig, Jana L Gevertz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Guidelines for mechanistic modeling and analysis in cardiovascular research.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Santiago D CárdenasDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA.
Constance J ReznikDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA.
Ruchira RanaweeraDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Feifei SongDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Christine H ChungDepartment of Head and Neck-Endocrine Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5199-4306
Elana J FertigConvergence Institute, Department of Oncology, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Applied Mathematics and Statistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA. ejfertig@jhmi.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-3204-342X
Jana L GevertzDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, NJ, USA. gevertz@tcnj.edu.
Moffitt Cancer Center · USCollege of New Jersey · USJohns Hopkins University · USLi Creative Technologies (United States) · US

Funding

Dynamical Models of Cetuximab Resistance in HNSCC Based on Serial Genomics DataR01CA177669 · NCI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FERTIG, ELANA · 2014 to 2019
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA177669
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The promise of precision medicine has been limited by the pervasive resistance to many targeted therapies for cancer. Inferring the timing (i.e., pre-existing or acquired) and mechanism (i.e., drug-induced) of such resistance is crucial for designing effective new therapeutics. This paper studies cetuximab resistance in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) using tumor volume data obtained from patient-derived tumor xenografts. We ask if resistance mechanisms can be determined from this data alone, and if not, what data would be needed to deduce the underlying mode(s) of resistance. To answer these questions, we propose a family of mathematical models, with each member of the family assuming a different timing and mechanism of resistance. We present a method for fitting these models to individual volumetric data, and utilize model selection and parameter sensitivity analyses to ask: which member(s) of the family of models best describes HNSCC response to cetuximab, and what does that tell us about the timing and mechanisms driving resistance? We find that along with time-course volumetric data to a single dose of cetuximab, the initial resistance fraction and, in some instances, dose escalation volumetric data are required to distinguish among the family of models and thereby infer the mechanisms of resistance. These findings can inform future experimental design so that we can best leverage the synergy of wet laboratory experimentation and mathematical modeling in the study of novel targeted cancer therapeutics.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCetuximabDrug Resistance, NeoplasmErbB ReceptorsHumansResearch DesignSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckCetuximabErbB Receptors

Identifiers

PMID36075912
PMCPMC9458753
OpenAlexW4295078508

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.