Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36076046›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Identification and genetic diversity analysis of hybrid offspring of azalea based on EST-SSR markers.

Ming Su, Chunying Zhang, Shucheng Feng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ming SuShanghai Botanical Garden and Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Sustainable Plant Innovation, Scientific Research Center, Shanghai, 200231, China.
Chunying ZhangShanghai Botanical Garden and Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Sustainable Plant Innovation, Scientific Research Center, Shanghai, 200231, China. zhangchunying@shbg.org.
Shucheng FengShanghai Mjnicipal Landscape Management and Instructional Station, Shanghai, 200000, China.
Shanghai Botanical Garden · CNShanghai Institute of Landscape Gardening · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Azalea is a world famous flower with high economic and ornamental value. The breeding of new azalea varieties is mainly done by cross breeding. However, there is a risk that cross breeding may cause errors in the hybrid offspring due to contamination by exogenous pollen. Therefore, the identification of hybrid offspring is an important part of azalea breeding. In this study, the parents of three hybrid combinations and their 88 F1 hybrid offspring were selected to screen 15 pairs of EST-SSR primers to identify the authenticity of azalea hybrid offspring. The results showed that the authenticity of 88 azalea F1 hybrid progenies could be determined by at least four primer pairs. Genetic diversity analysis of azalea hybrid progeny revealed that the number of alleles and polymorphic information content of the progeny increased to different degrees, and the more distant the genetic distance between parents, the richer the polymorphic information. It is suggested that EST-SSR molecular marker can be applied for the early identification and genetic diversity analysis of the progeny of azalea hybrids. This method is of positive significance for improving the breeding efficiency of new varieties and exploring the genetic background of azalea.

Indexed as

Microsatellite RepeatsRhododendronAllelesExpressed Sequence TagsGenetic VariationPlant Breeding

Identifiers

PMID36076046
PMCPMC9458661
OpenAlexW4295088061

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.