Evidence mapPaperPMID 36078539Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Economic Evaluation of Health Behavior Interventions to Prevent and Manage Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Asia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Padam Kanta Dahal, Lal B Rawal, Rashidul Alam Mahumud, Grish Paudel, Tomohiko Sugishita, Corneel Vandelanotte

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Padam Kanta DahalSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5978-3762
Lal B RawalSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Rashidul Alam MahumudNHRMC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW 2006, Australia.
Grish PaudelSchool of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, Sydney, NSW 2000, Australia.
Tomohiko SugishitaSection of Global Health, Division of Public Health, Department of Public Health, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo 162-8666, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6707-5582
Corneel VandelanotteAppleton Institute, Physical Activity Research Group, Central Queensland University, Rockhampton, QLD 4702, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4445-8094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Health behavior interventions implemented in Asian countries often lack economic evaluations that effectively address the problems of type 2 diabetes mellitus. This review systematically assessed the existing literature on economic evaluation of health behavior interventions to prevent and manage type 2 diabetes mellitus for people living in Asian countries. Eligible studies were identified through a search of six bibliographic databases, namely, PubMed, Scopus, Public Health Database by ProQuest, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature Complete, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. Randomized controlled trials of health behavior interventions and studies published in the English language from January 2000 to May 2022 were included in the review. The search yielded 3867 records, of which 11 studies were included in the review. All included studies concluded that health behavior interventions were cost-effective. Eight of these studies undertook an evaluation from a health system perspective, two studies used both societal and health system perspectives, and one study utilized a societal and multi-payer perspective. This review identified the time horizon, direct and indirect medical costs, and discount rates as the most important considerations in determining cost effectiveness. These findings have implications in extending health behavior interventions to prevent and manage type 2 diabetes mellitus in low-resource settings, and are likely to yield the most promising outcomes for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2AsiaCost-Benefit AnalysisHealth BehaviorHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAsian countriescost effectivenessdiscount rateeconomic evaluationhealth behavior interventionstype 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID36078539
PMCPMC9518060

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.