Article in Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literature
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Zijing YanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Hao YuanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Junjie WangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zipeng YangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Pian ZhangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yasser S MahmmodInfectious Diseases, Department of Animal Medicine, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig 44511, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-1975-3454
Xiaohu WangInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Tanghui LiuCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Yining SongCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zhaowen RenCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Xiu-Xiang ZhangCollege of Agriculture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zi-Guo YuanCollege of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3592-4743
South China Agricultural University · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNHigher Colleges of Technology · AE
Funding
Key Research and Development Programme of Guangdong Province 2019B020218004National Natural Science Foundation of China 31972707Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2019A1515011534Scientific and Technological Research Projects of Foshan 2020001000151
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
background
methodsIn this study, we used
resultsAll chemotherapeutic compounds in this study can inhibit TE and cognitive behavior in the host. However, Anxa 1 is the most suitable material to inhibit mice TE.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.
Four Chemotherapeutic Compounds That Limit Blood-Brain-Barrier Invasion by · full record | Socratic