Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36081276›Full record

SynthesisCephalalgia : an international journal of headache2022

Effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A meta-analysis on 10 years of real-world data.

Michel Lanteri-Minet, Anne Ducros, Clement Francois, Elzbieta Olewinska, Mateusz Nikodem, Laure Dupont-Benjamin

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Cephalalgia : an international journal of headache, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Observational
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Michel Lanteri-MinetPain Department and FHU InovPain, Côte Azur University, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Anne DucrosNeurology Department, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5560-5013
Clement FrancoisCreativ-Ceutical, Paris, France.
Elzbieta OlewinskaCreativ-Ceutical, Kraków, Poland.
Mateusz NikodemCreativ-Ceutical, Kraków, Poland.
Laure Dupont-BenjaminAllergan (an AbbVie company), Tour CBX, Courbevoie, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis meta-analysis evaluated the real-world effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®), the first preventive treatment FDA-approved specifically for chronic migraine in 2010.

methodsWe systematically reviewed onabotulinumtoxinA observational data in chronic migraine published between 1 January 2010 and 31 March 2021. Random-effects models evaluated available data for primary and secondary endpoints defined in onabotulinumtoxinA pivotal trials at approximately 24 weeks and 52 weeks.

resultsOf the 44 full-text eligible studies (29 prospective; 13 retrospective; 2 other), seven evaluated change from baseline (mean[confidence interval]) at ∼24 weeks and ∼52 weeks, respectively, for onabotulinumtoxinA in:

conclusionThe meta-analysis reflecting real-world practice broadly corroborated with evidence from pivotal and long-term open-label studies of onabotulinumtoxinA in chronic migraine preventive treatment.

Indexed as

Acute PainBotulinum Toxins, Type AMigraine DisordersChronic DiseaseHeadacheHumansProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeBotulinum Toxins, Type ABOTOX®chronic migraineeffectivenessMeta-analysisonabotulinumtoxinApreventiveprophylaxisreal-world datareal-world evidence

Identifiers

PMID36081276
PMCPMC9693763

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.