ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Development and validation of a predictive model for new-onset atrial fibrillation in sepsis based on clinical risk factors.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review on the influence of coagulopathy and immune activation on New Onset Atrial Fibrillation in patients with sepsis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- The clinical pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation: outstanding questions from bedside to bench and back.Physiological reviews · 2026Review
- The cumulative incidence of atrial fibrillation in the hospitalized medical patient: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European heart journal open · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting postoperative atrial fibrillation in trauma patients admitted to the ICU.European journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Development and internal validation of an interpretable machine-learning model for identifying comorbid atrial fibrillation in patients with diabetic kidney disease.Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning to predict NOAF in ICU patients with CKD: validation in US and Chinese cohorts.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Sepsis-induced Atrial Fibrillation: Can We Predict and Prevent This High-Risk Complication?Cureus · 2025Review
- Clinical predictive model of new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Optimizing clinical prediction model for new-onset atrial fibrillation in critically ill patient: Based on machine learning.PloS one · 2025Article
- Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in Sepsis.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Construction and validation of a predictive model for new-onset atrial fibrillation in patients with acute myocardial infarction following emergency percutaneous coronary intervention based on novel inflammatory markers.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Myeloperoxidase and its derivative hypochlorous acid combined clinical indicators predict new-onset atrial fibrillation in sepsis: a case-control study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2024Article
- Prediction of new-onset atrial fibrillation in sepsis patients by machine learning: A systematic review.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NOAF) is a common complication and one of the primary causes of increased mortality in critically ill adults. Since early assessment of the risk of developing NOAF is difficult, it is critical to establish predictive tools to identify the risk of NOAF. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 1,568 septic patients treated at Wuhan Union Hospital (Wuhan, China) as a training cohort. For external validation of the model, 924 patients with sepsis were recruited as a validation cohort at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (Urumqi, China). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to screen predictors. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve were used to assess the value of the predictive model in NOAF. Results: A total of 2,492 patients with sepsis (1,592 (63.88%) male; mean [SD] age, 59.47 [16.42] years) were enrolled in this study. Age (OR: 1.022, 1.009-1.035), international normalized ratio (OR: 1.837, 1.270-2.656), fibrinogen (OR: 1.535, 1.232-1.914), C-reaction protein (OR: 1.011, 1.008-1.014), sequential organ failure assessment score (OR: 1.306, 1.247-1.368), congestive heart failure (OR: 1.714, 1.126-2.608), and dopamine use (OR: 1.876, 1.227-2.874) were used as risk variables to develop the nomogram model. The AUCs of the nomogram model were 0.861 (95% CI, 0.830-0.892) and 0.845 (95% CI, 0.804-0.886) in the internal and external validation, respectively. The clinical prediction model showed excellent calibration and higher net clinical benefit. Moreover, the predictive performance of the model correlated with the severity of sepsis, with higher predictive performance for patients in septic shock than for other patients. Conclusion: The nomogram model can be used as a reliable and simple predictive tool for the early identification of NOAF in patients with sepsis, which will provide practical information for individualized treatment decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.