SynthesisFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Incidence of coronary drug-eluting stent fracture: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drug-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in the treatment of drug-refractory intracranial atherosclerotic disease: a retrospective single-center comparison.CVIR endovascular · 2026Article
- Case Report: A case of acute anterior wall myocardial infarction caused by stent fracture in the left anterior descending artery.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Published Evidence on Peripheral Atherectomy: A Meta-analysis and Systematic Literature Review of More Than 300 Original Investigations.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Review
- A Novel Utilization of a Peripheral Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent to Treat Recurrent Coronary Stent Fracture.JACC. Case reports · 2025Article
- Case report: intracoronary stent fracture complicated with coronary abscess and fistulization into the pericardium.European heart journal. Case reports · 2024Article
- A case of repeated stent fracture.Oxford medical case reports · 2024Article
- Numerical Simulation of Dynamic Degradation and Fatigue Damage of Degradable Zinc Alloy Stents.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Reported evidence of coronary stent fracture (CSF) has increased in recent years. The purpose of this study was to determine reliable estimates of the overall incidence of CSF. Methods and results: The MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched until March 18, 2022. Pooled estimates were acquired using random effects models. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were used to explore sources of heterogeneity, and publication bias was evaluated by visual assessment of funnel plots and Egger's test. Overall, 46 articles were included in this study. Estimates of CSF incidence were 5.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-7.7%] among 39,953 patients based on 36 studies, 4.8% (95% CI: 3.1-6.8%) among 39,945 lesions based on 29 studies and 4.9% (95% CI: 2.5-9.4%) among 19,252 stents based on 8 studies. There has been an obvious increase in the incidence of CSF over the past two decades, and it seems that the duration of stent placement after stent implantation has no impact on incidence estimation. Conclusion: The incidence of CSF was 5.5% among patients, 4.8% for lesions and 4.9% for stents and increased over the past 20 years. The duration of stent placement after stent implantation was found to have no impact on the incidence of CSF, but drug-eluting stent (DES) types and right coronary artery (RCA) lesions influenced the pooled incidence. Systematic review registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022311995], identifier [CRD42022311995].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.