Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36082254›Full record

ArticleEuropean stroke journal2022

European Stroke Organisation guidelines on treatment of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease.

Marios Psychogios, Alex Brehm, Elena López-Cancio, Gian Marco De Marchis, Elena Meseguer, Aristeidis H Katsanos, Christine Kremer, Peter Sporns, Marialuisa Zedde, Adam Kobayashi and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European stroke journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06727006 (Stroke, Thrombolysis and Rescue Stenting), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
13.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06727006 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Stroke, Thrombolysis and Rescue Stenting

TypeobservationalSponsorASST Santi Paolo e CarloRan2023 to 2027Enrolled400ConditionsLarge Vessel Occlusion, Stroke Acute, Thrombolysis, Rescue Stenting
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Glycoprotein inhibitors as a first line rescue treatment after unsuccessful recanalization of endovascular thrombectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Guideline
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Acute intracranial stenting in acute ischemic stroke with underlying atherosclerosis: A two-center retrospective study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 10 countries.

Marios PsychogiosDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0016-414X
Alex BrehmDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Elena López-CancioDepartment of Neurology, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain.
Gian Marco De MarchisDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Center, University Hospital Basel and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0342-9780
Elena MeseguerDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Center, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bichat Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7184-2614
Aristeidis H KatsanosDivision of Neurology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Christine KremerDepartment of Neurology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5739-6523
Peter SpornsDepartment of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Marialuisa ZeddeNeurology Unit, Department of Neuromotor Physiology, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7530-818X
Adam KobayashiDepartment of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine - Collegium Medicum Cardinal Stefan Wyszynski University in Warsaw, Poland.
Jildaz CaroffDepartment of Interventional Neuroradiology - NEURI Brain Vascular Center, Bicêtre Hospital, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.
Daniel BosDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Sabrina LémeretEuropean Stroke Organisation, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8611-1630
Avtar LalEuropean Stroke Organisation, Basel, Switzerland.
Juan F ArenillasStroke Program, Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Spain.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FREuropean CanCer Organisation · BEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHAzienda Sanitaria Unità Locale di Reggio Emilia · ITErasmus MC · NLHospital Universitario Central de Asturias · ESLund University · SEPopulation Health Research Institute · CAUniversidad de Valladolid · ESUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Siedlce · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present European Stroke Organisation guideline is to provide clinically useful evidence-based recommendations on the management of patients with intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). The guidelines were prepared following the Standard Operational Procedure of the European Stroke Organisation guidelines and according to GRADE methodology. ICAD represents a major cause of ischemic stroke worldwide, and patients affected by this condition are exposed to a high risk for future strokes and other major cardiovascular events, despite best medical therapy available. We identified 11 relevant clinical problems affecting ICAD patients and formulated the corresponding Population Intervention Comparator Outcomes (PICO) questions. The first two questions refer to the asymptomatic stage of the disease, which is being increasingly detected thanks to the routine use of noninvasive vascular imaging. We were not able to provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the optimal detection strategy and management of asymptomatic ICAD, and further research in the field is encouraged as subclinical ICAD may represent a big opportunity to improve primary stroke prevention. The second block of PICOs (3-5) is dedicated to the management of acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke caused by ICAD, a clinical presentation of this disease that is becoming increasingly relevant and problematic, since it is associated with more refractory endovascular reperfusion procedures. An operational definition of probable ICAD-related LVO is proposed in the guideline. Despite the challenging context, no dedicated randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were identified, and therefore the guideline can only provide with suggestions derived from observational studies and our expert consensus, such as the escalated use of glycoprotein IIb-IIIa inhibitors and angioplasty/stenting in cases of refractory thrombectomies due to underlying ICAD. The last block of PICOs is devoted to the secondary prevention of patients with symptomatic ICAD. Moderate-level evidence was found to recommend against the use of oral anticoagulation as preferred antithrombotic drug, in favor of antiplatelets. Low-level evidence based our recommendation in favor of double antiplatelet as the antithrombotic treatment of choice in symptomatic ICAD patients, which we suggest to maintain during 90 days as per our expert consensus. Endovascular therapy with intracranial angioplasty and or stenting is not recommended as a treatment of first choice in high-grade symptomatic ICAD (moderate-level evidence). Regarding neurosurgical interventions, the available evidence does not support their use as front line therapies in patients with high-grade ICAD. There is not enough evidence as to provide any specific recommendation regarding the use of remote ischemic conditioning in ICAD patients, and further RCTs are needed to shed light on the utility of this promising therapy. Finally, we dedicate the last PICO to the importance of aggressive vascular risk factor management in ICAD, although the evidence derived from RCTs specifically addressing this question is still scarce.

Indexed as

guidelineintracranial artherosclerosisIntracranial atherosclerotic diseasestroke

Identifiers

PMID36082254
PMCPMC9446330
OpenAlexW4229001324

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.