ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2023
"They were an advocate for me": A Qualitative Study Exploring Medical Student Longitudinal Relationships and Patient Well-Being.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of early, longitudinal community-based education on medical student self-efficacy: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Exploring the role of the JEEViKA swasthya mitra helpdesk in improving healthcare access: a qualitative study in tertiary healthcare facilities in Bihar, India.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatient navigators, community health workers, and care management teams improve patient experience and health outcomes. Medical student involvement in these roles is limited. Evaluation of these programs focuses on the student experience with less attention to patient participants.
objectivesWe sought (1) to understand the experience of being a participant in a medical education program; (2) to explore the patient-medical student relationship; and (3) to describe the impact of this relationship on patient health and well-being.
designThis was a qualitative study that utilized in-depth semi-structured interviews.
participantsParticipants were selected based on enrollment in a preceptorship program at an urban academic medical center between 2017 and 2020. Participants worked with a medical student during an 18-month period in which the medical student was embedded in a primary care medical home, serving as a health systems navigator for 1-2 medically and socially complex patients. APPROACH: Nine participants completed 1-h compensated phone interviews. This study was deemed IRB exempt. KEY
resultsThree themes and eight subthemes were identified, including Navigators Were Key to Accessing the System, Interpersonal Partnerships Improved Health, and Fulfillment in Teaching of Lived Experience. Navigators eased the burden of chronic illness by being a point of contact in the health system, which improved participants' overall experience. Participants also described the relationship as therapeutic, citing improvement and stability in both mental and physical health. Lastly, participants found meaning in chronic illness by teaching their students empathy.
conclusionsLongitudinal patient-medical student relationships may provide stability and health benefits. These partnerships have the possibility of adding value to patients' healthcare experiences. This study complements current literature highlighting the value of these relationships for pre-clinical medical students. As such, additional opportunities for and additional research regarding the value of longitudinal patient connection should be incorporated in undergraduate medical education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.