Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36091023›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in immunology2022

Facing the Omicron variant-how well do vaccines protect against mild and severe COVID-19? Third interim analysis of a living systematic review.

Wiebe Külper-Schiek, Vanessa Piechotta, Antonia Pilic, Madeleine Batke, Léa-Sophie Dreveton, Brogan Geurts, Judith Koch, Stefan Köppe, Marina Treskova, Sabine Vygen-Bonnet and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Comparison of Long COVID-19 Caused by Different SARS-CoV-2 Strains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Effect of vaccination on COVID-19 hospitalizations and mortality.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2023
    Article
  16. Patients Hospitalized With Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Diverse Population.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wiebe Külper-SchiekDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Vanessa PiechottaDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Antonia PilicDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Madeleine BatkeDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Léa-Sophie DrevetonDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Brogan GeurtsCentre for International Health Protection, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Judith KochDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Stefan KöppeDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Marina TreskovaDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Sabine Vygen-BonnetDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Maria WaizeDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Ole WichmannDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Thomas HarderDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Robert Koch Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Robert Koch Institute · DEHeidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Omicron variant is currently the dominant variant globally. This third interim analysis of a living systematic review summarizes evidence on the effectiveness of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (vaccine effectiveness, VE) and duration of protection against Omicron. Methods: We systematically searched literature on COVID-19 for controlled studies, evaluating the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines approved in the European Union up to 14/01/2022, complemented by hand searches of websites and metasearch engines up to 11/02/2022. We considered the following comparisons: full primary immunization vs. no vaccination, booster immunization vs. no vaccination, and booster vs. full primary immunization. VE against any confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, symptomatic, and severe COVID-19 (i.e., COVID-19-related hospitalization, ICU admission, or death) was indicated, providing estimate ranges. Meta-analysis was not performed due to high study heterogeneity. The risk of bias was assessed with ROBINS-I, and the certainty of the evidence was evaluated using GRADE. Results: We identified 26 studies, including 430 to 2.2 million participants, which evaluated VE estimates against infections with the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. VE against any confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection ranged between 0-62% after full primary immunization and between 34-66% after a booster dose compared to no vaccination. VE range for booster vs. full primary immunization was 34-54.6%. After full primary immunization VE against symptomatic COVID-19 ranged between 6-76%. After booster immunization VE ranged between 3-84% compared to no vaccination and between 56-69% compared to full primary immunization. VE against severe COVID-19 ranged between 3-84% after full primary immunization and between 12-100% after booster immunization compared to no vaccination, and 100% (95% CI 71.4-100) compared to full primary immunization (data from only one study). VE was characterized by a moderate to strong decline within 3-6 months for SARS-CoV-2 infections and symptomatic COVID-19. Against severe COVID-19, protection remained robust for at least up to 6 months. Waning immunity was more profound after primary than booster immunization. The risk of bias was moderate to critical across studies and outcomes. GRADE certainty was very low for all outcomes. Conclusions: Under the Omicron variant, the effectiveness of EU-licensed COVID-19 vaccines in preventing any SARS-CoV-2 infection is low and only short-lasting after full primary immunization, but can be improved by booster vaccination. VE against severe COVID-19 remains high and is long-lasting, especially after receiving the booster vaccination.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesInfluenza VaccinesCOVID-19Omicron variantSARS-CoV-2systematic reviewvaccinationvaccine effectivenessvariant of concern

Identifiers

PMID36091023
PMCPMC9449804
OpenAlexW4293113133

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.