Evidence mapPaperPMID 36092005Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2022

Intrapartum cardiotocography trace pattern pre-processing, features extraction and fetal health condition diagnoses based on RCOG guideline.

Shahad Al-Yousif, Ihab A Najm, Hossam Subhi Talab, Nourah Hasan Al Qahtani, M Alfiras, Osama Ym Al-Rawi, Wisam Subhi Al-Dayyeni, Ali Amer Ahmed Alrawi, Mohannad Jabbar Mnati, Mu'taman Jarrar and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Generational Leaps in Intrapartum Fetal Surveillance.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 5 countries.

Shahad Al-YousifResearch Centre, The University of Almashreq, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ihab A NajmCollege of Engineering, Tikrit University, Tikrit, Iraq.
Hossam Subhi TalabChildren Welfare Teaching Hospital, Medical City, (MD, CABP, CAB Neonatology), Baghdad, Iraq.
Nourah Hasan Al QahtaniDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Al Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
M AlfirasCollege of Engineering, Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Gulf University, Almasnad, Kingdom of Bahrain.
Osama Ym Al-RawiCollege of Engineering, Department of Electrical & Electronic Engineering, Gulf University, Almasnad, Kingdom of Bahrain.
Wisam Subhi Al-DayyeniResearch Centre, The University of Almashreq, Baghdad, Iraq.
Ali Amer Ahmed AlrawiFaculty of Engineering, Alanbar University, Alanbar, Iraq.
Mohannad Jabbar MnatiDepartment of Electronic Technology, Institute of Technology Baghdad, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0003-0276-9246
Mu'taman JarrarCollege of Medicine, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Al Dammam, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7748-2069
Fahad GhabbanDepartment of Information Systems College of Computer Science and Engineering, Taibah University, Al Madinah Al Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia.
Nael A Al-ShareefiCollege of Biomedical Informatics, University of Information Technology and Communications (UOITC), Baghdad, Iraq.ORCID 0000-0001-7277-090X
Mustafa Musa JaberAl-Turath University College, Department of Computer Engineering, Baghdad, Iraq.
Abbadullah H SalehDepartment of Computer Engineering, Karabük University, Karabük, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-3019-5833
Nooritawati Md TahirElectrical Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Shah Alam, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-3082-8963
Huda T NajimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
Mayada TaherDepartment of Laser and Optoelectronics Engineering, University of Technology, Baghdad, Iraq.
Gulf University · RSImam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University · SAUniversity of Technology - Iraq · IQAl-Turath University · IQBaghdad Medical City · IQDijlah University College · IQKarabük University · TRMiddle Technical University · IQTaibah University · SAUniversiti Teknologi MARA · MYUniversity of Anbar · IQUniversity of Information Technology and Communications · IQUniversity of Tikrit · IQ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Context: The computerization of both fetal heart rate (FHR) and intelligent classification modeling of the cardiotocograph (CTG) is one of the approaches that are utilized in assisting obstetricians in conducting initial interpretation based on (CTG) analysis. CTG tracing interpretation is crucial for the monitoring of the fetal status during weeks into the pregnancy and childbirth. Most contemporary studies rely on computer-assisted fetal heart rate (FHR) feature extraction and CTG categorization to determine the best precise diagnosis for tracking fetal health during pregnancy. Furthermore, through the utilization of a computer-assisted fetal monitoring system, the FHR patterns can be precisely detected and categorized. Objective: The goal of this project is to create a reliable feature extraction algorithm for the FHR as well as a systematic and viable classifier for the CTG through the utilization of the MATLAB platform, all the while adhering to the recognized Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG) recommendations. Method: The compiled CTG data from spiky artifacts were cleaned by a specifically created application and compensated for missing data using the guidelines provided by RCOG and the MATLAB toolbox after the implemented data has been processed and the FHR fundamental features have been extracted, for example, the baseline, acceleration, deceleration, and baseline variability. This is followed by the classification phase based on the MATLAB environment. Next, using the guideline provided by the RCOG, the signals patterns of CTG were classified into three categories specifically as normal, abnormal (suspicious), or pathological. Furthermore, to ensure the effectiveness of the created computerized procedure and confirm the robustness of the method, the visual interpretation performed by five obstetricians is compared with the results utilizing the computerized version for the 150 CTG signals. Results: The attained CTG signal categorization results revealed that there is variability, particularly a trivial dissimilarity of approximately (+/-4 and 6) beats per minute (b.p.m.). It was demonstrated that obstetricians' observations coincide with algorithms based on deceleration type and number, except for acceleration values that differ by up to (+/-4). Discussion: The results obtained based on CTG interpretation showed that the utilization of the computerized approach employed in infirmaries and home care services for pregnant women is indeed suitable. Conclusions: The classification based on CTG that was used for the interpretation of the FHR attribute as discussed in this study is based on the RCOG guidelines. The system is evaluated and validated by experts based on their expert opinions and was compared with the CTG feature extraction and classification algorithms developed using MATLAB.

Indexed as

CardiotocographElectronic fetal monitoringFetal heart rateUterine contraction

Identifiers

PMID36092005
PMCPMC9454876
OpenAlexW4292243012

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.