ArticleiScience2022
Probabilistic boolean networks predict transcription factor targets to induce transdifferentiation.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Conventional and Alternative B Lymphopoiesis: Multiple Roads to Immunity.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2026Review
- Article
- Advances in modeling cellular state dynamics: integrating omics data and predictive techniques.Animal cells and systems · 2025Review
- Exploring the interplay between circadian rhythms and obesity: A Boolean network approach to understanding metabolic dysregulation.PloS one · 2025Article
- Next-generation direct reprogramming.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Review
- Quantifying cancer cell plasticity with gene regulatory networks and single-cell dynamics.Frontiers in network physiology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We developed a computational approach to find the best intervention to achieve transcription factor (TF) mediated transdifferentiation. We construct probabilistic Boolean networks (PBNs) from single-cell RNA sequencing data of two different cell states to model hematopoietic transcription factors cross-talk. This was achieved by a "sampled network" approach, which enabled us to construct large networks. The interventions to induce transdifferentiation consisted of permanently activating or deactivating each of the TFs and determining the probability mass transfer of steady-state probabilities from the departure to the destination cell type or state. Our findings support the common assumption that TFs that are differentially expressed between the two cell types are the best intervention points to achieve transdifferentiation. TFs whose interventions are found to transdifferentiate progenitor B cells into monocytes include EBF1 down-regulation, CEBPB up-regulation, TCF3 down-regulation, and STAT3 up-regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.