ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022
Knowledge domain and emerging trends in diabetic cardiomyopathy: A scientometric review based on CiteSpace analysis.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A scientometric analysis of research on the role of NMDA receptor in the treatment of depression.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2024Pooled it
- Roles of gas molecules and related factors in knee cartilage injury and repair: a bibliometric visualization analysis of research hotspots.Medical gas research · 2026Review
- Knowledge graph visualization and retrospective analysis of genetic research on pediatric cardiomyopathy (2000-2024).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Uncovering the Independent Role of Lipid Peroxidation in Osteoporosis Through an Integrated Bibliometric and Bioinformatics Analysis.Mediators of inflammation · 2026Article
- Global trends in artificial intelligence applications in liver disease over seventeen years.World journal of hepatology · 2025Article
- Performance-enhancing substances in sport: A scientometric review of 75 years of research.Drug testing and analysis · 2025Review
- Liver cancer from the perspective of single-cell sequencing: a review combined with bibliometric analysis.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Review
- Evolutionary trend analysis and knowledge structure mapping of endothelial dysfunction in sepsis: a bibliometrics study.World journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- A Bibliometric Visualization Analysis on Vaccine Development of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19).Vaccines · 2023Article
- Global research trends between gut microbiota and lung cancer from 2011 to 2022: A bibliometric and visualization analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Study on bioactive compounds of microalgae as antioxidants in a bibliometric analysis and visualization perspective.Frontiers in plant science · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To review the literature related to diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), and investigate research hotspots and development trends of this field in the relevant studies based on CiteSpace software of text mining and visualization in scientific literature. Methods: The relevant literature from the last 20 years was retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection database. After manual selection, each document record includes title, authors, year, organization, abstract, keywords, citation, descriptors, and identifiers. We imported the downloaded data into CiteSpace V (version 5.8.R2) to draw the knowledge map and conduct cooperative network analysis, cluster analysis, burst keyword analysis, and co-citation analysis. Results: After manual screening, there were 3,547 relevant pieces of literature published in the last 18 years (from 2004 to 2021), including 2,935 articles and reviews, which contained 15,533 references, and the number was increasing year by year. The publications of DCM were dedicated by 778 authors of 512 institutions in 116 countries. The People's Republic of China dominated this field (1,117), followed by the USA (768) and Canada (176). In general, most articles were published with a focus on "oxidative stress," "heart failure," "diabetic cardiomyopathy," "dysfunction," "cardiomyopathy," "expression," "heart," "mechanism," and "insulin resistance." Then, 10 main clusters were generated with a modularity Q of 0.6442 and a weighted mean silhouette of 0.8325 by the log-likelihood ratio (LLR) algorithm, including #0 heart failure, #1 perfused heart, #2 metabolic disease, #3 protective effect, #4 diabetic patient, #5 cardiac fibrosis, #6 vascular complication, #7 mitochondrial dynamics, #8 sarcoplasmic reticulum, and #9 zinc supplementation. The top five references with the strongest citation bursts include "Boudina and Abel", "Jia et al.", "Fang et al.", "Poornima et al.", and "Aneja et al.". Conclusion: The global field of DCM has expanded in the last 20 years. The People's Republic of China contributes the most. However, there is little cooperation among authors and institutions. Overall, this bibliometric study identified the hotspots in DCM research, including "stress state," "energy metabolism," "autophagy," "apoptosis," "inflammation," "fibrosis," "PPAR," etc. Thus, further research focuses on these topics that may be more helpful to identify, prevent DCM and improve prophylaxis strategies to bring benefit to patients in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.