Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36096756›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2022

Effects of physical exercise on blood pressure during pregnancy.

Zhu Zhu, Hang Xie, Shiping Liu, Ruizhe Yang, Juan Yu, Yiping Yan, Xu Wang, Zhihua Zhang, Wu Yan

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Prediction and secondary prevention of preeclampsia from the perspective of public health management - the initiative of the State of Rio de Janeiro.Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia · 2024
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Zhu Zhu *Jiangsu Vocational Institute of Commerce, Nanjing, 211168, China.
Hang Xie *Office of Clinical Research Center, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Shiping Liu *Department of Orthopedics, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Ruizhe YangDepartment of Public Health, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Juan YuDepartment of Medicine, Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Dingxi, 743000, China.
Yiping YanCollege of Mathematics and Statistics, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Xu WangDepartment of Endocrinology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China.
Zhihua ZhangYunyang People's Hospital of Danyang, Danyang, 212300, China. gaoxiaoa@163.com.
Wu YanDepartment of Children Health Care, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210008, China. yanwu@njmu.edu.cn.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University · CNGansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine · CNJiangsu Vocational Institute of Commerce · CNNanjing Children's Hospital · CNNorthwest Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveEffect of physical exercise on pregnant women currently has become a hot topic in prenatal health care. In this study, A meta-analysis was conducted on account of Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). It focused on evaluating the effect of physical exercise intervention on blood pressure so that could provide certain evidence for health care during pregnancy.

methodsResults of relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library, and all of these included studies were evaluated according to the Cochrane collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias. Stata 15.1 was used for meta-analysis, and mean difference (MD) was used as statistic for pooled analysis. The effect values were combined by conventional meta-analysis and Bayesian meta-analysis respectively, and the consistency of pooled results was considered as well.

resultsA total of 18 RCT studies were included in the quantitative analysis. The conventional meta-analysis showed differences in blood pressure between intervention group and control group (P < 0.05). Systolic and diastolic blood pressures of intervention group were 3.19 mmHg (95% CI: -5.13, -1.25) and 2.14 mmHg (95% CI: -4.26, -0.03) lower than that of control group, respectively. Bayesian meta-analysis showed that both systolic and diastolic pressure among intervention group decreased by 3.34 mmHg (95% CrI: -5.15, -1.56) and 2.14 mmHg (95% CrI: -3.79, - 0.50), respectively. Subgroup analysis supported that as long as healthy pregnant women participated in exercises, their blood pressure could be slightly regulated, while hypertension susceptible pregnant women significantly lowered blood pressure.

conclusionExercise intervention during pregnancy is beneficial to lower or normalize blood pressure, and this research provides clues for follow-up studies.

Indexed as

ExerciseHypertensionBlood PressureExercise TherapyFemaleHumansPregnancyRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSystoleBlood pressureExerciseMeta-analysisPregnancyRandomized controlled trials

Identifiers

PMID36096756
PMCPMC9469521
OpenAlexW4295469427

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.