Trial reportBMC health services research2022
Barriers and facilitators when implementing family involvement for persons with psychotic disorders in community mental health centres - a nested qualitative study.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03869177 (Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders in Community Mental Health Centres. A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons With Psychotic Disorders in Community Mental Health Centres. A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effectiveness of Illness Management and Recovery program on people with severe mental illnesses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2023Pooled it
- Effectiveness of implementing family involvement on patient outcomes in individuals with psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.BMC psychiatry · 2025Trial
- Exploring Implementation Processes of a Multicomponent Family Support Intervention in Intensive Care Units (FICUS) Study: A Mixed-Methods Process Evaluation.Journal of advanced nursing · 2025Trial
- Implementation of Guidelines on Family Involvement for Persons with Psychotic Disorders (IFIP): A Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.Administration and policy in mental health · 2023Trial
- "It has to be part of the clinic's lived culture"- perspectives of next of kin on meaningful participation in psychiatric care: a participatory thematic analysis.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Who Gets FIp? Understanding Contextual Factors in EIP Provision.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Expressed emotions and caregiving appraisals among relatives of patients with psychotic disorders: a cross-sectional study.BMC psychiatry · 2026Article
- Family psychoeducation to support patients with psychotic illness: two-year outcomes from a pre-post longitudinal pilot study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- "Where are we on the Road Towards Family-focused Practice in Mental Healthcare?" - Perspectives from a Swedish/Norwegian Research Collaborative.Community mental health journal · 2026Article
- Exploring the preferences of multiple stakeholder groups for family involvement in early intervention services for psychosis: A cross-sectional mixed-methods study.PLOS mental health · 2026Article
- A turning point after FACT: a qualitative study of family members' experiences and follow-up provided by flexible assertive community treatment.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Impact of introducing a capacity-based mental health law in Norway: qualitative exploration of multi-stakeholder perspectives.BJPsych open · 2025Article
- Facilitators and Barriers of Implementing Expanded Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening in California Family Planning Clinics.Sexually transmitted diseases · 2025Article
- The TIPS family psychoeducational group work approach in first episode psychosis and related disorders: 25 years of experiences.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Barriers and facilitators in implementing advance care planning for frail older patients acutely admitted to geriatric hospital units: a nested qualitative study.Frontiers in health services · 2025Article
- Supporting psychosis research, implementation, and training through an academic intermediary-purveyor organization.Psychological services · 2024Article
- Nurses' perceptions of involving family members in the care of mental health care users.Curationis · 2024Article
- Something Happened with the Way We Work: Evaluating the Implementation of the Reducing Coercion in Norway (ReCoN) Intervention in Primary Mental Health Care.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders: a pragmatic cluster randomized trial. Effect on relatives' outcomes and family interventions received.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- A Proxy Approach to Family Involvement and Neurocognitive Function in First Episode of Non-Affective Psychosis: Sex-Related Differences.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe uptake of family involvement in health care services for patients with psychotic disorders is poor, despite a clear evidence base, socio-economic and moral justifications, policy, and guideline recommendations. To respond to this knowledge-practice gap, we established the cluster randomised controlled trial: Implementation of guidelines on Family Involvement for persons with Psychotic disorders in community mental health centres (IFIP). Nested in the IFIP trial, this sub-study aims to explore what organisational and clinical barriers and facilitators local implementation teams and clinicians experience when implementing family involvement in mental health care for persons with psychotic disorders.
methodsWe performed 21 semi-structured focus groups, including 75 participants in total. Implementation team members were interviewed at the initial and middle phases of the intervention period, while clinicians who were not in the implementation team were interviewed in the late phase. A purposive sampling approach was used to recruit participants with various engagement in the implementation process. Data were analysed using manifest content analysis.
resultsOrganisational barriers to involvement included: 1) Lack of shared knowledge, perceptions, and practice 2) Lack of routines 3) Lack of resources and logistics. Clinical barriers included: 4) Patient-related factors 5) Relative-related factors 6) Provider-related factors. Organisational facilitators for involvement included: 1) Whole-ward approach 2) Appointed and dedicated roles 3) Standardisation and routines. Clinical facilitators included: 4) External implementation support 5) Understanding, skills, and self-efficacy among mental health professionals 6) Awareness and attitudes among mental health professionals.
conclusionsImplementing family involvement in health care services for persons with psychotic disorders is possible through a whole-ward and multi-level approach, ensured by organisational- and leadership commitment. Providing training in family psychoeducation to all staff, establishing routines to offer a basic level of family involvement to all patients, and ensuring that clinicians get experience with family involvement, reduce or dissolve core barriers. Having access to external implementation support appears decisive to initiate, promote and evaluate implementation. Our findings also point to future policy, practice and implementation developments to offer adequate treatment and support to all patients with severe mental illness and their families.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03869177. Registered 11.03.19.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.