Evidence mapPaperPMID 36100300Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2022

Association between continuity of primary care and both prescribing and adherence of common cardiovascular medications: a cohort study among patients in England.

Peter Tammes, Rupert A Payne, Chris Salisbury

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bridging success in the labour market: does continuity of general practitioners' care matter for individuals with common mental disorders?The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Structured medication reviews: progress since 2020 and opportunities for improvement.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter TammesCentre for Academic Primary Care (CAPC), Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK p.tammes@bristol.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0001-7959-745X
Rupert A PayneCentre for Academic Primary Care (CAPC), Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5842-4645
Chris SalisburyCentre for Academic Primary Care (CAPC), Bristol Medical School: Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-3960
University of Bristol · GBAt Bristol · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate whether better continuity of care is associated with increased prescribing of clinically relevant medication and improved medication adherence.

settingRandom sample of 300 000 patients aged 30+ in 2017 within 83 English general practitioner (GP) practices from the Clinical Practice Research Datalink.

designPatients were assigned to a randomly selected index date in 2017 on which medication use and continuity of care were determined. Adjusted associations between continuity of care and the prescribing and adherence of five cardiovascular medication groups were examined using logistic regression.

participantsContinuity of Care Index was calculated for 173 993 patients with 4+ GP consultations 2 years prior to their index date and divided into five categories: absence of continuity, below-average continuity, average, above-average continuity and perfect continuity.

main outcome measures(A) Prescription for statins (primary or secondary prevention separately), anticoagulants, antiplatelet agents and antihypertensives covering the patient's index date. (B) Adherence (>80%) estimated using medication possession ratio.

resultsThere was strong evidence (p<0.01) that prescription of all five cardiovascular medication groups increased with greater continuity of care. Patients with absence of continuity were less likely to be prescribed cardiovascular medications than patients with above-average continuity (statins primary prevention OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59 to 0.85; statins secondary prevention 0.77, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.03; antiplatelets 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.92; antihypertensives 0.51, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.65). Furthermore, patients with perfect continuity were more likely to be prescribed cardiovascular medications than those with above-average continuity (statins primary prevention OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.49; statins secondary prevention 1.37, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.71; antiplatelets 1.37, 95% CI 1.08 to 1.74; antihypertensives 1.10, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.23). Continuity was generally not associated with medication adherence, except for adherence to statins for secondary prevention (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60 to 0.94 for average compared with above-average continuity).

conclusionBetter continuity of care is associated with improved prescribing of medication to patients at higher risk of cardiovascular disease but does not appear to be related to patient's medication adherence.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsAntihypertensive AgentsCohort StudiesHumansPrimary Health CareAntihypertensive AgentsCardiovascular AgentsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsCardiologyHealth & safetyOrganisation of health servicesSTATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS

Identifiers

PMID36100300
PMCPMC9472141
OpenAlexW4295751472

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.