Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36105215›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2022

Investigating brain uptake of a non-targeting monoclonal antibody after intravenous and intracerebroventricular administration.

Arthur J Van De Vyver, Antje-Christine Walz, Mariette S Heins, Afsaneh Abdolzade-Bavil, Thomas E Kraft, Inja Waldhauer, Michael B Otteneder

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Arthur J Van De VyverRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Antje-Christine WalzRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Mariette S HeinsCharles River Laboratories Den Bosch, Groningen, Netherlands.
Afsaneh Abdolzade-BavilRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Thomas E KraftRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Munich, Penzberg, Germany.
Inja WaldhauerRoche Pharma Research and Early Development (pRED), Roche Innovation Center Zurich (RICZ), Schlieren, Switzerland.
Michael B OttenederRoche Pharma Research and Early Development, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Roche Innovation Center Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Roche (Switzerland) · CHRoche Pharma AG (Germany) · DECharles River Laboratories (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monoclonal antibodies play an important role in the treatment of various diseases. However, the development of these drugs against neurological disorders where the drug target is located in the brain is challenging and requires a good understanding of the local drug concentration in the brain. In this original research, we investigated the systemic and local pharmacokinetics in the brain of healthy rats after either intravenous (IV) or intracerebroventricular (ICV) administration of EGFRvIII-T-Cell bispecific (TCB), a bispecific monoclonal antibody. We established an experimental protocol that allows serial sampling in serum, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and interstitial fluid (ISF) of the prefrontal cortex in freely moving rats. For detection of drug concentration in ISF, a push-pull microdialysis technique with large pore membranes was applied. Brain uptake into CSF and ISF was characterized and quantified with a reduced brain physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model. The model allowed us to interpret the pharmacokinetic processes of brain uptake after different routes of administration. The proposed model capturing the pharmacokinetics in serum, CSF and ISF of the prefrontal cortex suggests a barrier function between the CSF and ISF that impedes free antibody transfer. This finding suggests that ICV administration may not be better suited to reach higher local drug exposure as compared to IV administration. The model enabled us to quantify the relative contribution of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and Blood-CSF-Barrier to the uptake into the interstitial fluid of the brain. In addition, we compared the brain uptake of three monoclonal antibodies after IV dosing. In summary, the presented approach can be applied to profile compounds based on their relative uptake in the brain and provides quantitative insights into which pathways are contributing to the net exposure in the brain.

Indexed as

blood-brain barrier (BBB)blood CSF barrier (BCSFB)brain uptakemicrodialysismonoclonal antibodypharmacokineticsphysiologically–based pharmacokinetic model

Identifiers

PMID36105215
PMCPMC9465605
OpenAlexW4293761304

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.