Evidence mapPaperPMID 36105404Full record

ArticleFrontiers in endocrinology2022

Comparison of the impact of autologous cell therapy and conservative standard treatment on tissue oxygen supply and course of the diabetic foot in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia: A randomized controlled trial.

Michal Dubský, Jitka Husáková, Robert Bem, Alexandra Jirkovská, Andrea Němcová, Vladimíra Fejfarová, Karol Sutoris, Michal Kahle, Edward B Jude

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Michal DubskýDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Jitka HusákováDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Robert BemDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Alexandra JirkovskáDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Andrea NěmcováDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Vladimíra FejfarováDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Karol SutorisDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Michal KahleDiabetes Centre, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Prague, Czechia.
Edward B JudeTameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust and University of Manchester, Ashton under Lyne, United Kingdom.
Institute of Clinical and Experimental Medicine · CZCharles University · CZTameside and Glossop Integrated Care NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Autologous cell therapy (ACT) is a new treatment method for patients with diabetes and no-option chronic limb-threatening ischemia (NO-CLTI). We aimed to assess the impact of ACT on NO-CLTI in comparison with standard treatment (ST) in a randomized controlled trial. Methods: Diabetic patients with NO-CLTI were randomized to receive either ACT (n=21) or ST (n=19). After 12 weeks, those in the ST group, who did not improve were treated with ACT. The effect of ACT on ischemia and wound healing was assessed by changes in transcutaneous oxygen pressure (TcPO Results: During the first 12 weeks, TcPO Conclusions: This study has showed that ACT treatment in patients with no-option CLTI and diabetic foot significantly improved limb ischemia and wound healing after 12 weeks compared to conservative standard therapy. Larger randomized controlled trials are needed to study the benefits of ACT in patients with NO-CLTI and diabetic foot disease. Trial registration: The trial was registered in the National Board of Health (EudraCT 2016-001397-15).

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusDiabetic FootCell- and Tissue-Based TherapyChronic Limb-Threatening IschemiaHumansIschemiaOxygenPainRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicOxygenautologous cell therapychronic limb-threatening ischemiadiabetic footmajor amputation of lower extremityrevascularization

Identifiers

PMID36105404
PMCPMC9464922
OpenAlexW4293421044

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.